Earth Blackbody Temp: How Albedo Affects Result

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cepheid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackbody Earth
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of Earth's blackbody temperature and the effects of albedo on this result. Participants explore theoretical models and calculations related to Earth's energy balance, specifically addressing how different assumptions impact the estimated surface temperature without the greenhouse effect.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially calculated Earth's temperature assuming it as a perfect blackbody and found a temperature of 60°C, later adjusting for albedo to get 30°C and 22°C, but not -18°C.
  • Another participant corrected the area ratio used in calculations, stating that the ratio of the absorbing area to the radiating area is 4, leading to a temperature estimate of -23°C with an albedo of 0.37.
  • A later reply acknowledged the importance of emissivity and corrected the geometric factor, reproducing a result of about 15°C but remaining uncertain about the origin of the -18°C figure.
  • One participant calculated a temperature of 6°C, questioning the justification for albedo and emissivity summing to less than 1.
  • Another participant argued that the heat generated by radioactive decay is negligible compared to solar energy absorption, providing estimates for both energy sources.
  • One participant noted a personal calculation of -14°C for unblanketed surface temperature, differing from the -18°C claim and requesting clarification on the source of that figure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculations and assumptions regarding albedo, emissivity, and the impact of Earth's internal heat. No consensus is reached on the exact temperature estimates or the validity of the -18°C claim.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their calculations, such as assumptions about emissivity and the geometric factors used. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of albedo values and their implications for temperature estimates.

cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38
I saw a claim today that without the greenhouse effect, Earth's surface would be on average at a chilling -18°C (note: this is not a climate change thread).

I set about trying to reproduce this result, so at first I assumed that Earth was a perfect blackbody, and that in order to be in equilibrium, it would have to radiate away as much power as it received. So I took the solar irradiance of ~1400 W/m2 and divided it by 2 (since I figured that the surface area over which it could be radiated away again would be twice the surface area over which it was received). Then I took this irradiance (or 'flux' in astronomy parlance) and divided it by the Stefan-Boltzmann constant in order to get the fourth power of the surface temperature that the Earth would have to have in order to have this surface flux (as a blackbody). The resulting surface temperature was T = 60°C.

Then I decided it was silly to assume that all of the incident solar radiation was absorbed, so I looked up the Albedo (reflectivity) of Earth on Wikipedia. Two numbers were stated: geometric Albedo of 0.367 and Bond Albedo of 0.306. Being too lazy to read more about them, I just tried them both. Assuming them to be the fraction of radiation reflected, I scaled my required output flux by (1-Albedo) and got results of 30°C and 22°C for the lower and higher albedos respectively. Neither of these is -18°C. What am I missing (aside from the obvious that Earth is not a blackbody). Shouldn't this method give something reasonably close? I assumed that an equally crude estimate was applied to arrive at the -18°C in the first place.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The area of sunlight that the Earth intercepts is pi*r^2, while the surface area that radiates energy away is 4*pi*r^2, so the ratio of the absorbing area to radiating area is 4, not 2. Figuring this, and the albedo of 0.37, gives a temperature of:
T=[\frac{1400*(1-.37)}{4*5.67*10^{-8}}]^{1/4} = 250K = -23C
 
Okay so I looked here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_model#Zero-dimensional_models

and I see that I was

1. failing to take into account the effect of emissivity < 1
2. getting my geometric factor wrong (apparently the irradiated surface should be considered to be circular rather than hemispherical?)

I reproduced their result of about 15°C, but I don't know where -18 comes from still. They say that their albedo and emissivity are chosen to account for clouds and greenhouse effect already, so maybe that's it.
 
phyzguy said:
The area of sunlight that the Earth intercepts is pi*r^2, while the surface area that radiates energy away is 4*pi*r^2, so the ratio of the absorbing area to radiating area is 4, not 2. Figuring this, and the albedo of 0.37, gives a temperature of:
T=[\frac{1400*(1-.37)}{4*5.67*10^{-8}}]^{1/4} = 250K = -23C

I agree. It looks like if you keep the emissivity factor out of it (i.e. assume it is 1), more will be radiated away, and the temperature will be colder (-23°C), whereas if I take their emissivity value, less is radiated away, and the temperature reaches 8°C (the discrespancy between this and their value of 15°C is because they used a lower albedo of 0.3). So it all makes sense. Thank you.

EDIT: In fact if I use their albedo value of 0.3, but an emissivity of 1, then I get -17°C, which is close enough for me!
 
I got 6°C, using the fact that the reflectivity + emissivity = 1 (I'm not sure how they justify albedo + emissivity <1)

Of course, the Earth also *generates* heat by radioactive decay:

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46592

but it's too early in the day for me to work through the (0th order) correction.
 
I think the interior heat is negligible in terms of the heat balance of the Earth. This article says that the heat flowing from the interior is ~ 4x10^13 W. The heat absorbed from the sun is ~ 1.4x10^3 W/m2 * pi * (6.4x10^6m)^2 * (0.7) ~ 10^17 W.
 
cepheid said:
I saw a claim today that without the greenhouse effect, Earth's surface would be on average at a chilling -18°C (note: this is not a climate change thread).

The consensus of informed opinion is that the blanket of greenhouse gases increases the Earth's surface temperature by an average of 39°C. That surface temperature is usually given as 288K (15°C). My calculations give an unblanketed surface temperature of -14°C, not -18C. You didn't specify your source.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K