Earth stops moving how long before it hits the sun?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster is exploring a hypothetical scenario where the Earth stops moving in its orbit, questioning how long it would take for it to fall into the Sun. The discussion involves concepts from celestial mechanics, particularly relating to orbital dynamics and gravitational interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of Kepler's laws and Newton's formulations regarding orbital periods. There are questions about the parameters involved in these formulas and the reasoning behind using certain values, such as r/2 instead of r. Some participants express confusion about the application of orbital mechanics to the scenario presented.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing hints and guidance on the mathematical approach to the problem. Some have suggested sketching the orbit to visualize the scenario, while others are clarifying the relationship between the semi-major axis and the radius of the orbit. There appears to be a productive exchange of ideas, though no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about the nature of the Earth's motion and the implications of stopping it. There is a focus on understanding the correct application of orbital mechanics in this unusual context.

blue.flake
Messages
11
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


So, if the Earth stopped moving(supposing Earth's orbit is a circle) how much time would it have to pass before it hit the Sun?

Homework Equations


I've tried with Kepler, and Newton's derivations of Kepler's 3th law

The Attempt at a Solution


Well I'm pretty sure you need to get 64.56 days, but I'm having a few difficulties with the process of getting there.

Also, I'm in a bit of a rush. So if anyone can help I'll be forever in your debt.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint:

You know Newton's formula for the period of a body in an elliptical orbit? What parameter(s) of the orbit does that formula depend upon?
 
Well my biggest problem is I get to a point where I have T= √4Π ⋅ (r/2)3 / G ⋅ Ms

and then it seems I should divide T with two, which I don't understand why. Also in this step i don't understand why it's r/2 and not r
 
what

Have you tried N2L?

If the Earth stops then (classically) it's at rest. Why are you using orbital periods? Maybe I"m misunderstanding the question.
 
Write out your math from the start. What's the basic formula for the period? (You can use μ = G*Msun).

What orbit parameter goes into the period formula? Hint: for circular orbits it happens to be the same as the orbit radius.

You want half the period because when you "drop" the Earth into the Sun you're only interested in the time for it to reach the Sun, not the time for it to reach the Sun and return to its starting place, which would be a full period of the degenerate orbit.
 
Well honestly I'm completely lost, and at this point totally desperate. I'm really not sure what to do. This is how I done it, but I'm not even sure it's the right way to go
 

Attachments

  • 1..jpg
    1..jpg
    26.9 KB · Views: 511
  • 2..jpg
    2..jpg
    22.8 KB · Views: 491
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
what

Have you tried N2L?

If the Earth stops then (classically) it's at rest. Why are you using orbital periods? Maybe I"m misunderstanding the question.
Integrating an acceleration that depends upon distance in order to solve for time is much more work than using orbit equations in a creative way :)
 
Is my way the right creative way? :D
 
Newton's version of Kepler's 3rd for elliptical orbits is:
$$T = \frac{2 \pi}{\sqrt{\mu}} a^{\left(3/2\right)}$$
where a is the length of the semi-major axis of the ellipse. Note that the semi-minor axis size is not involved, and that for a circular orbit a is the same as the orbit radius.

Sketch your "degenerate" orbit that's equivalent to the Earth plunging straight into the Sun. Effectively the semi-minor axis shrinks down to negligible width, while the perihelion distance becomes indistinguishable from the Sun's center.

Be sure to indicate the semi-major axis on your diagram!
 
  • #10
so a =r? but then I did it right or?
 
  • #11
blue.flake said:
so a =r? but then I did it right or?
Can we see your sketch?
 
  • #12
It's probably not complete.
 

Attachments

  • 10846705_817503974973327_1839200853_n.jpg
    10846705_817503974973327_1839200853_n.jpg
    6.8 KB · Views: 491
  • #13
Okay, that's incomplete as you say. What you want to do is consider an elliptical orbit where the temporarily "stationary" Earth is at the aphelion point. As the minor axis of the orbit is shrunk down to negligible size, the perihelion distance pulls closer to the Sun's center.



Fig1.gif


Note that the major axis of the orbit is 2a, where a is called the semi-major axis (half the major axis). For your "degenerate" orbit the whole major axis is the same size as the original orbit radius of the circular orbit.

So, what is the value of "a" for your problem?
 
  • #14
ooooh it's r/2 or 1,496*10^11 m divided by 2
 
  • #15
blue.flake said:
ooooh it's r/2 or 1,496*10^11 m divided by 2
Right. So that explains why you need to use r/2 in the period formula. Can you also see why you want half the period of the resulting orbit?
 
  • #16
Yes because it only falls to the Sun, it doesn't go back. :D
 
  • #17
blue.flake said:
Yes because it only falls to the Sun, it doesn't go back. :D

Correct :approve:
 
  • #18
That's pretty clever gneill, and also not how I would have approached that at all. =D
 

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K