Easier Method to Calculate Earth's Circumference

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the Earth's circumference using Eratosthenes' method and an alternative method proposed by a professor. The Eratosthenes method involves measuring the angle of shadows cast by sticks at different latitudes, while the professor's method simplifies this by suggesting the use of a protractor to measure angles directly. The participants express uncertainty about the effectiveness of the alternative method and the orientation of the sticks in relation to cardinal directions. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding shadow angles and their relationship to Earth's curvature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Eratosthenes' method for calculating circumference
  • Basic geometry concepts related to angles and shadows
  • Familiarity with using a protractor for angle measurement
  • Knowledge of cardinal directions and their significance in geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical principles behind Eratosthenes' method
  • Explore alternative methods for measuring Earth's circumference
  • Learn about the geometry of shadows and their applications in real-world scenarios
  • Investigate the use of protractors in various measurement techniques
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and anyone interested in practical applications of geometry and methods for measuring large distances, particularly in the context of Earth sciences.

marcusau
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
My professor was showing us how to calculate the Circumference of the Earth using Eratosthenes method, as shown here. I completely understand this method. http://www.bsin.k12.nm.us/Curriculum/CAP/completed%20files/astronomy/completed%20files/eratosthenescircumf.html

However he told us he had an easier method and to use it. I'm not sure if it works, however. I have attached the slide from his lecture that explains what he was saying to do. I understand Eratosthene's method because the sun's rays are directly over the southern most stick and the shadow cast by the northern stick then can be used to find the angle that subtends the arc, which is the distance between the two sticks.

I suppose using his method you have to measure the angle cast by both sticks using a protractor, rather than having the option to use geometry like in the original.

Also, I am not sure about the direction of the shadow cast by the sun based on the way he has the sticks are oriented, given the cardinal directions given in the diagram.

Thanks for any help or input.
 

Attachments

  • eratosthene.jpg
    eratosthene.jpg
    31.3 KB · Views: 887
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
The diagram looks like the same method, just that the Sun need not be directly overhead as in your description and the one in your link. It is the difference between the two shadows that counts - if you wait for one of the shadows to have no length, then the math is probably easier.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K