Easy (but not to me) Modern Algebra Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter c.francis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for a Carmichael number n (where n > 2) and an odd prime p, the condition gcd(p-1, n-1) > 1 holds true. The user employs Fermat's Little Theorem to establish that if a is coprime to n and does not divide p, then both ap-1 ≡ 1 (mod p) and an-1 ≡ 1 (mod n) lead to the conclusion that the order of a modulo p divides both n-1 and p-1. This implies that gcd(n-1, p-1) is indeed greater than 1, confirming the original statement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Carmichael numbers
  • Fermat's Little Theorem
  • Concept of greatest common divisor (gcd)
  • Basic number theory, particularly modular arithmetic
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Carmichael numbers in depth
  • Learn advanced applications of Fermat's Little Theorem
  • Explore the implications of gcd in number theory
  • Investigate the concept of order of an integer in modular arithmetic
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying number theory, educators teaching algebraic concepts, and anyone interested in advanced proofs involving modular arithmetic and gcd calculations.

c.francis
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I am hoping that someone can please give me some help with this homework problem.

Homework Statement


In n>2 is a Carmichael number and p/n is an odd prime, then show that gcd(p-1,n-1) >1


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


This is what I did, but I am not sure if its right:

Choose an a coprime to n and that does not divide p (2 will work because p is prime and carmichael numbers are odd).

Then ap-1 \equiv1 (mod p) (by Fermats Little Theorem) and an-1 \equiv1 (mod n) by definition. This implies that an-1 \equiv1 (mod p) because p/n.

So to finish can I just say that because ap-1 \equiv1 (mod p) and an-1 \equiv1 (mod p) this implies that ap-1^some integer=an-1, and so (p-1)/(n-1)?


Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about this revised version, is this right?

Choose an a coprime to n and that does not divide p (2 will work because p is prime and carmichael numbers are odd).

Then by FLT, ap-1\equiv1 (mod p), and by definition an-1\equiv1 (mod n). Then because p/n, an-1\equiv1 (mod p). Now this implies that the order of a mod p (which cannot be 1 because that would mean a is 1 and 1 isn't coprime to n and does divide p) divides both n-1 and p-1. Thus the gcd(n-1,p-1) is greater than 1.
 
I haven't really had a lot of time to think about this, but stop writing p/n instead of p|n. (i.e. p divides n). It confused me right off the bat, and may confuse other people. Who might know number theory a lot better than I do.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K