Modular Arithmetic (someone check my work please)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in modular arithmetic, specifically concerning the implications of the equation \(x^{2} \equiv 1 \mod 47\) for natural numbers \(n\). The original poster attempts to demonstrate that this leads to either \(x^{n} \equiv 1 \mod 47\) or \(x^{n} \equiv 46 \mod 47\) based on the parity of \(n\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the completeness of the original poster's argument, noting missing steps and suggesting that a simpler case (choosing \(n=1\)) could clarify the situation. There is also mention of considering the expression \((x^2-1)\) in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising concerns about the original poster's reasoning and suggesting alternative approaches. There is no explicit consensus yet, as multiple interpretations and methods are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are examining the implications of the modular equation under the assumption that \(47\) is prime, and they are considering the implications of different values of \(n\). There is an emphasis on the need for clarity in the argument presented.

mtayab1994
Messages
584
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For every x in Z and for every natural number n if:

x^{2}\equiv1(mod47)\Rightarrow x^{n}\equiv1(mod47)orx^{n}\equiv46(mod47)



The Attempt at a Solution



Alright I said since 47 is prime and relatively prime with x then by fermat's little theorem we will get:

x^{46}\equiv1(mod47)

and (x^{2})^{23}\equiv1^{23}(mod47) so that's case one.

And when multiplying both sides by 46 we will get:
46(x^{2})^{23}\equiv46*1^{23}(mod47)

which is x^{47}\equiv46(mod47).

So then i was able to conclude that if n=2k such that k is an integer we get:
x^{n}\equiv1(mod47)

And if we have n=2k+1 (odd number) such that k is an integer we get:

x^{n}\equiv46(mod47)

Is that correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems like there are a lot of steps missing in this argument.

Choosing n=1, it is clear that no more is needed than to show that ##x \equiv 1 \text{ mod } 47## or ##x \equiv 46 \text{ mod } 47##.

Consider ##(x^2-1)##...
 
Joffan said:
It seems like there are a lot of steps missing in this argument.

Choosing n=1, it is clear that no more is needed than to show that ##x \equiv 1 \text{ mod } 47## or ##x \equiv 46 \text{ mod } 47##.

Consider ##(x^2-1)##...


Yea and x^-1=(x+1)(x-1)
 
... and we know that ##(x^2-1) \equiv 0 \text{ mod } 47## ...
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K