Effect of CMB (cosmic microwave background) on objects at relativistic speeds

rorix_bw
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
A hypothetical question relating to

1) moving a physical object at a significant % of c.

2) interaction with the cosmic microwave background radiation

Is it the case that doppler effect and time dilation means that the CMB is going to be physically damaging to the object?

Further what would happen if a source of microwave energy (e.g. from a transmitter) was directed towards such an object?

This is from a sci-fi discussion, but I just got this idea and I don't know what would happen.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sort of, but first off, it doesn't just have to be a significant fraction of c, it has to be ultrarelativistic, i.e., very, very close to c. Also, there are other forms of matter and radiation besides the CMB that would fry you much worse than the CMB. I think the interstellar medium (mostly hydrogen) would be the most damaging. Starlight from the forward direction would also be Doppler shifted into the gamma spectrum.
 
rorix_bw said:
A hypothetical question relating to

1) moving a physical object at a significant % of c.

2) interaction with the cosmic microwave background radiation

Is it the case that doppler effect and time dilation means that the CMB is going to be physically damaging to the object?

I know that there is the possibility of some objects to interact with CMB. It is the case of high energy electrons that can react with CMB photon through inverse Compton scattering. This leads to a detectable distortion of CMB spectrum. It is a way used to detect clusters of galaxies and the anisotropies. This effect is called Sunyaev Zeldovich effect.
 
A Doppler-shifted blackbody spectrum is itself a blackbody spectrum. So at about 150 m/s less than c (time dilation factor = 1000) the CMB will be a blackbody with a temperature around 2700 K, close to stellar surface temperatures.

bcrowell is pretty smart, so he may be right that matter will be a probelm before the CMB. I am not sure, I would have to see a calculation, but certainly the CMB isn't the only hazard to ultrarelativistic travel.
 
Interesting, then I might be on the right track: beaming microwaves in all directions could possibly act as a shield against such a hyopthetical projectile. It's off topic for this thread however I guess. Although it seems to be correct that such projectiles would initiate a nuclear reaction on impact.

EDIT: I think i already mentioned hitting stray hydrogen atoms and space dust in that other thread.
 
Last edited:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top