B Effect of JWST mirror damage on final images

Click For Summary
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) experienced damage to one of its mirror segments from a meteoroid impact, raising concerns about how this will affect image quality. The consensus is that the damage will not create localized artifacts but rather result in a slight blur across the entire image. Unlike traditional telescopes, JWST operates as a single system rather than a mosaic of multiple images, meaning any aberration will be distributed rather than concentrated in one area. The mirror damage will not manifest as a dark spot but will instead lead to a subtle degradation of resolution. Overall, the impact of the damage will be a minor blur rather than significant visual artifacts.
GhostLoveScore
Messages
149
Reaction score
9
As most of us know, James Webb Space Telescope suffered a damage to one of its mirror segments due to meteoroid impact. How will that damage show in the images?

Some people on certain forum I visit say that there will be some artifacts visible in only one part of the image, but that doesn't make sense to me. What I expect are some very small artifacts (is aberration the right word?) across entire image. My reasoning is, if you mask or remove part of the mirror on Newtonian telescope, you won't be missing one part of the image in the ocular. The image will bi darker and smaller resolution, but it will be the entire image.

Am I wrong about this? Is JWST working differently than regular single mirror/lens telescope? I don't have a very good knowledge of optics.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are correct - Webb is one telescope forming one image, not eighteen forming a mosaic. A qualitative way to look at it is that Webb is not looking at its own mirror, so the mirror and any damage are out of focus (as far out of focus as it's possible to be) and the effect is a slight blur spread across the whole image rather than a comedy black spot in one corner.

If engineers were still doing the mirror pre-alignment work where they showed eighteen images of one star then only one of them would show aberration. Perhaps that's what your friends are thinking of - but that is not Webb's operating mode.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970, FactChecker, BillTre and 4 others
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
14K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K