Effect of JWST mirror damage on final images

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) experienced damage to one of its mirror segments due to a meteoroid impact, which will result in slight blurring across the entire image rather than localized artifacts. Unlike traditional telescopes that may exhibit distinct dark spots, JWST's design integrates multiple mirror segments into a single image, causing any aberration to manifest as a uniform blur. This understanding clarifies misconceptions about how mirror damage affects image quality in advanced optical systems like JWST.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical systems and telescope design
  • Familiarity with the principles of image formation in telescopes
  • Knowledge of aberration types in optics
  • Basic concepts of mirror alignment and pre-alignment processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of mirror damage on optical performance in telescopes
  • Study the principles of aberration in optical systems
  • Learn about the JWST mirror alignment process and its significance
  • Explore the differences between segmented and monolithic mirror designs in telescopes
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, optical engineers, and anyone interested in the operational mechanics of advanced telescopes like the James Webb Space Telescope.

GhostLoveScore
Messages
149
Reaction score
9
As most of us know, James Webb Space Telescope suffered a damage to one of its mirror segments due to meteoroid impact. How will that damage show in the images?

Some people on certain forum I visit say that there will be some artifacts visible in only one part of the image, but that doesn't make sense to me. What I expect are some very small artifacts (is aberration the right word?) across entire image. My reasoning is, if you mask or remove part of the mirror on Newtonian telescope, you won't be missing one part of the image in the ocular. The image will bi darker and smaller resolution, but it will be the entire image.

Am I wrong about this? Is JWST working differently than regular single mirror/lens telescope? I don't have a very good knowledge of optics.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are correct - Webb is one telescope forming one image, not eighteen forming a mosaic. A qualitative way to look at it is that Webb is not looking at its own mirror, so the mirror and any damage are out of focus (as far out of focus as it's possible to be) and the effect is a slight blur spread across the whole image rather than a comedy black spot in one corner.

If engineers were still doing the mirror pre-alignment work where they showed eighteen images of one star then only one of them would show aberration. Perhaps that's what your friends are thinking of - but that is not Webb's operating mode.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970, FactChecker, BillTre and 4 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
14K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 184 ·
7
Replies
184
Views
23K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K