B Effect of JWST mirror damage on final images

AI Thread Summary
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) experienced damage to one of its mirror segments from a meteoroid impact, raising concerns about how this will affect image quality. The consensus is that the damage will not create localized artifacts but rather result in a slight blur across the entire image. Unlike traditional telescopes, JWST operates as a single system rather than a mosaic of multiple images, meaning any aberration will be distributed rather than concentrated in one area. The mirror damage will not manifest as a dark spot but will instead lead to a subtle degradation of resolution. Overall, the impact of the damage will be a minor blur rather than significant visual artifacts.
GhostLoveScore
Messages
149
Reaction score
9
As most of us know, James Webb Space Telescope suffered a damage to one of its mirror segments due to meteoroid impact. How will that damage show in the images?

Some people on certain forum I visit say that there will be some artifacts visible in only one part of the image, but that doesn't make sense to me. What I expect are some very small artifacts (is aberration the right word?) across entire image. My reasoning is, if you mask or remove part of the mirror on Newtonian telescope, you won't be missing one part of the image in the ocular. The image will bi darker and smaller resolution, but it will be the entire image.

Am I wrong about this? Is JWST working differently than regular single mirror/lens telescope? I don't have a very good knowledge of optics.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are correct - Webb is one telescope forming one image, not eighteen forming a mosaic. A qualitative way to look at it is that Webb is not looking at its own mirror, so the mirror and any damage are out of focus (as far out of focus as it's possible to be) and the effect is a slight blur spread across the whole image rather than a comedy black spot in one corner.

If engineers were still doing the mirror pre-alignment work where they showed eighteen images of one star then only one of them would show aberration. Perhaps that's what your friends are thinking of - but that is not Webb's operating mode.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970, FactChecker, BillTre and 4 others
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
Back
Top