A Effect of visible light on conductivity

EngPhy
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
Are metals better conductors in the presence of visible light? Considering photons in visible spectrum are not energetic enough to induce emission from a metal surface but they do cause the ejection of 'conduction electrons' which are bound to the metal by a few electron volts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Metal are substances which have partially filled conduction bands with electrons and the number of electrons is very high, one or two per atom.
Photoconductivity is observed mostly in semiconductors. Semiconductors have empty conduction band and almost full valence band just around 1 eV below.
The electrons in the conduction band are coming from either doping or are thermally excited and their number is rather small, one per millions of atoms.
When you shine light on a semiconductor you excite electrons from the valence to conduction band and the conductivity increases.
 
Henryk said:
No. Metal are substances which have partially filled conduction bands with electrons and the number of electrons is very high, one or two per atom.
Photoconductivity is observed mostly in semiconductors. Semiconductors have empty conduction band and almost full valence band just around 1 eV below.
The electrons in the conduction band are coming from either doping or are thermally excited and their number is rather small, one per millions of atoms.
When you shine light on a semiconductor you excite electrons from the valence to conduction band and the conductivity increases.

Good answer, thank you
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top