Effective mass of the electron for Si

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the effective mass of electrons and holes in silicon (Si), particularly focusing on the differing values reported for holes (0.57 vs. 0.81) and the conditions under which one might be preferred over the other. Participants explore the implications of band structure and curvature on effective mass, as well as the challenges in understanding these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the effective mass for holes in Si can vary between 0.57 and 0.81, questioning if there is a temperature regime that influences which value should be used.
  • It is mentioned that there are two bands at the \Gamma point, referred to as light and heavy holes, each associated with different band curvatures affecting their effective masses.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the term "gamma," seeking clarification and additional resources on the topic.
  • Another participant explains that effective mass is influenced by the shape of the band, suggesting that irregularities in band shape in Si lead to significant variations in effective mass values.
  • A specific discrepancy is highlighted regarding the heavy hole band, where the lack of spherical symmetry results in differences between calculated effective mass values based on spherical constant-energy surfaces and those derived from density of states calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effective mass values for holes in Si and the factors influencing these values, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about band structure and the definitions of effective mass, as well as unresolved mathematical steps related to the calculations of effective mass based on different methods.

ZeroFunGame
Messages
93
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
Which effective mass should I use?
https://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/effmass.htm#short

Looks like the effective mass for holes in Si can either be 0.57 or 0.81, according to the link above.

Is there a temperature regime where one effective mass should be used instead of the other?

Is anyone able to explain in layman's terms why the effective mass is disputed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two bands at \Gamma = 0, the light and heavy holes, each has their own band curvature which is related to the effective mass for each..
 
Forgive my ignorance, but what is gamma? If there's a link on this topic that I could read more on, that would be great! Thank you!
 
Effective mass depends on the shape of the band. So if in Si you have messy shaped bands you should expect the value of effective mass to change very much. But in the link you posted it is said that

  • 1 Due to the fact that the heavy hole band does not have a spherical symmetry there is a discrepancy between the actual effective mass for density of states and conductivity calculations (number on the right) and the calculated value (number on the left) which is based on spherical constant-energy surfaces. The actual constant-energy surfaces in the heavy hole band are "warped", resembling a cube with rounded corners and dented-in faces.

So basically I think they are telling you that the approximation they used to carry out the calculations about the structure of the band does not match with the other way of evaluating the effective mass (via the density of states, as I understood).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
17K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
19K