Effects of Intermolecular Forces?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effects of intermolecular forces, specifically in the context of a van der Waals gas. It is established that attractive intermolecular forces, such as London dispersion forces, lead to a decrease in pressure and volume due to gas particles clumping together, while temperature decreases as kinetic energy diminishes. Conversely, repulsive forces, often misunderstood in this context, do not exist as intermolecular forces but can be attributed to electromagnetic interactions. The relationship between kinetic energy and intermolecular forces determines the state of matter, with KE exceeding IF resulting in a gaseous state.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of van der Waals gases
  • Knowledge of intermolecular forces, specifically London dispersion forces
  • Familiarity with kinetic energy and its relation to molecular motion
  • Basic principles of gas laws and states of matter
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of London dispersion forces on gas behavior
  • Study the relationship between kinetic energy and intermolecular forces in different states of matter
  • Explore the concept of elastic and inelastic collisions in gas particles
  • Investigate the role of electromagnetic forces in molecular interactions
USEFUL FOR

Students of chemistry, physicists, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of gases under varying intermolecular forces and their implications on physical properties.

Gwozdzilla
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
For a van der Waals gas, there are London dispersion forces causing the gas particles to be attracted to each other while the law of excluded volume provides repulsive forces. How do each of these characteristics effect the pressure, volume, and temperature of the gas?

I assumed that for the attractive intermolecular forces, pressure and volume would decrease because the particles would clump together (smaller volume) and hit the sides of their container less (less pressure). At the same time, I think that temperature would increase because the molecules would have a greater kinetic energy from bumping into each other. Thus, I believe the opposite would be the case for the repulsive forces.

Is this actually the case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gwozdzilla said:
For a van der Waals gas, there are London dispersion forces causing the gas particles to be attracted to each other while the law of excluded volume provides repulsive forces. How do each of these characteristics effect the pressure, volume, and temperature of the gas?

I assumed that for the attractive intermolecular forces, pressure and volume would decrease because the particles would clump together (smaller volume) and hit the sides of their container less (less pressure). At the same time, I think that temperature would increase because the molecules would have a greater kinetic energy from bumping into each other. Thus, I believe the opposite would be the case for the repulsive forces.

Is this actually the case?
The KE would NOT increase if IF forces increased, think about it in terms of particles, if IF increase, then the displacement between the particles decrease, a decrease in dispacement causes a decrease in velocity and thus KE so will tempature would decrease.
If IF forces increase then
Volume=decrease
Pressure=decrease
know that the if KE>IF the state of matter is a gas, and also that if IF>KE the state of matter is a solid and lastly that if IF>=KE the state of matter is a liquid.
 
Are you sure that a gas with high intermolecular forces would not still fill all the available volume in any container you put it in?
 
Simon Bridge said:
Are you sure that a gas with high intermolecular forces would not still fill all the available volume in any container you put it in?
gases have low intermolecular forces, that is why they are free to move around .A property of a gas is that they fill the volume of the container so of course they would.
 
Sorry we cross posted - the question was intended for OP.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Sorry we cross posted - the question was intended for OP.
NP, hope that helped the OP though, funny that you are helping me on my thread I just posted about resonance.
 
Jewish_Vulcan said:
The KE would NOT increase if IF forces increased, think about it in terms of particles, if IF increase, then the displacement between the particles decrease, a decrease in dispacement causes a decrease in velocity and thus KE so will tempature would decrease.
If IF forces increase then
Volume=decrease
Pressure=decrease
know that the if KE>IF the state of matter is a gas, and also that if IF>KE the state of matter is a solid and lastly that if IF>=KE the state of matter is a liquid.

Do you mean that attractive intermolecular forces will decrease volume, pressure, and temperature, while repulsive molecular forces would increase volume, pressure, and temperature? Why would a decrease in displacement, which would cause a decrease in velocity, outweigh the increase in velocity caused by inelastic collisions between the molecules?
 
Gwozdzilla said:
Do you mean that attractive intermolecular forces will decrease volume, pressure, and temperature, while repulsive molecular forces would increase volume, pressure, and temperature? Why would a decrease in displacement, which would cause a decrease in velocity, outweigh the increase in velocity caused by inelastic collisions between the molecules?
There are no repulsive intermolecular forces, maybe you mean the repulsive elctromagnetic forces? when we analyze the molecules we assume that their colisions are elastic. A decrease in displacement causes velocity to decrease, if velocity decreases then KE must decrease becasue KE=1/2mv^2. Remember that is KE is greater than IF than the particles can escape the substance via evaporation for example. Furthermore the attractive forces are not the same as intermoleclar forces, they cause other substances like water on a table to want to stick together.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K