Effects of lug height on final gear ratio for a snowmobile....

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the effects of lug height on the final drive ratio of snowmobiles, particularly considering different conditions such as driving on pavement versus snow. Participants explore how changes in lug height and track thickness might influence the effective drive ratio, incorporating various factors like slippage and the geometry of the drive system.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that increasing lug height may change the final drive ratio, particularly when driving on hard surfaces like pavement due to the larger radius from the axle.
  • Others argue that on snow, the effect of lug height on the drive ratio is less clear and may depend on the interaction between the lugs and the snow, with potential variations in effective center of force.
  • A participant proposes that the thickness of the track does not affect the drive ratio if there is no slippage, as the drive wheel's speed over the track equals the vehicle's speed over the ground.
  • Some participants express that the actual length of the track is irrelevant to the drive ratio, focusing instead on the horizontal section of the track that transfers drive to the ground.
  • There is a suggestion that the tangential forces from the rotating teeth of the track do not affect the effective gearing, as the horizontal component remains consistent across the teeth.
  • A participant questions the differences in gear ratio determination between a single drive wheel and a tracked vehicle with multiple rotating axes, leading to further exploration of the mechanics involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express differing views on the impact of lug height and track thickness on the final drive ratio, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the conditions of use (e.g., snow versus pavement) and the mechanics of the drive system are not fully explored, leading to potential gaps in understanding the overall impact of lug height and track thickness on drive ratios.

  • #91
jbriggs444 said:
There is no track flat on the ground between those two wheels and no indication of the thickness that such a track might have.

That's where the 'imagine' part of imagine comes into play.....:approve:
jbriggs444 said:
Statements of opinion about who is right or who is wrong are unhelpful.

Lol... well, "are unhelpful" is an opinion isn't it ?

Stay on track, now... don't derail ..... :oldgrumpy:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
This thread has run its course, and is now closed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nidum

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K