Efficiency of Siphons: Vacuum & Pressure

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pi22/7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the efficiency and functionality of siphons in different environments, specifically in vacuum and pressurized conditions. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of siphons, including the role of pressure, surface tension, and liquid properties.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a siphon could theoretically work in a vacuum, while others argue that most liquids would boil in such conditions.
  • One participant asserts that a siphon cannot function in a vacuum because liquid cannot withstand negative pressures, which is necessary for the siphon to operate against gravity.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes that a siphon operates due to surface tension and intermolecular forces, questioning the feasibility of siphoning mercury from a container.
  • A participant discusses the limitations of siphon height, noting that excessive height could lead to boiling due to pressure drops.
  • There is mention of unique cases, such as long-chain molecules and superfluids, which can siphon without traditional tubing due to their properties.
  • A participant proposes a concept of a perpetual siphon, suggesting that a vacuum created in a long tube could potentially overcome atmospheric pressure and other resistances, although this idea is met with skepticism.
  • Another participant counters the perpetual siphon idea, stating that flow requires a pressure difference, which is contingent on the source being higher than the sink.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the functionality of siphons in vacuum and pressurized environments, with no consensus reached on the theoretical viability of a perpetual siphon or the role of surface tension in siphoning various liquids.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to pressure, boiling points of liquids, and the specific properties of different fluids, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

Pi22/7
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Although I generally understand how a siphon works, I am wondering if a siphon would work in a vacuum or in a pressurized environment?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes in theory. In practice most liquids will boil in vacuum.
 
No, a siphon can't work in vakuum, not even in theory. Liquid in a siphon travels against the force of gravity (upwards) because it is pushed by the pressure: pressure must decrease with height, so that the upward force on the lower end of a small segment of liquid is greater than downward force on the upper end.
If the pressure is zero on the start of the pipe, it can't decrease with height since liquid can't stand negative pressures: so liquid can't flow against gravity.
 
A siphon works because of surface tension and intermolecular forces in the fluid.
It's a bit like a chain draggin itself over a pulley.
 
mgb_phys said:
A siphon works because of surface tension and intermolecular forces in the fluid.

Can you explain this? Could you not make a siphon out of a glass tube to drain mercury (which does not wet glass) out of a container?

My guess would be there must be at least enough pressure to support the column of liquid in the short arm of the siphon. Surface tension can be neglected for all sizes of tubes used in practice. In other words, you couldn't drain the water out of a bathtub on the second floor of the empire state building by running a hose up through a window in the 20th floor and
then down to the ground again on the outside. (I've never been to the empire state building; I hope it has 20 floors!) Even if the hose were full to begin with, it would develop a vapour-lock when the vapour pressure of the water plus the pressure exerted by the
water in the short end of the siphon equaled the external pressure of the atmosphere.
You said it yourself: when the liquid "boils", the siphon does not work.
 
There is a limit on how high you can make the hump in a siphon without the drop in pressure causing the liquid in the top of the siphon to boil.

Other than that it does depend totally on viscosity of the liquid, there are some long chain molecules that will siphon without a tube! If you hang a bit of it over the edge of a beaker the whole lot will flow out onto the floor. Basically the stuff falling down the long arm is heavy enough to pull the stuff in the short arm up.

Interestingly superfluids (liquid Helium) will also siphon themselves out of a beaker without having to start it - but this is due to them having no viscosity so that any adhesion to the surface of the beaker, however weak, is stronger than the bonds to the rest of the liquid - so this isn't really a siphon but looks like one.
 
Have been thinking about a perpetual siphon. Maybe I'm crazy.
What if the volume in a long downward tube exceeded the container from which the liquid is being siphoned and the end tube was raised above the original container's surface level? Once the syphoning has begun, at some point would not the pressure created from the vacuum of the increased volume in the exit tube be of sufficient length and capacity to compensate for atmospheric pressure and the resistance of the volume of the container being siphoned as well as all other resistances. Unlike the chain on the pulley example, we have introduced vacuum as a force for the unimpeded continuance of flow.
I am a complete ameteur at this, but I can't get this model out of my head and I think it will work. I should add that the flow from the end of the tube reenters the source tank. A spiral tube should accomplish the length aspect of this task, while limiting the volume of the source tank.
In other words, can the vacuum force in the tube overcome all other forces if the volume be of sufficient girth? The key is the volume of liquid inside the depository tube.
 
No, the only thing that adding these complexities does is distract you from the key issue: flow only happens when there is a pressure difference and the only way to have a pressure difference is if the source is higher than the sink.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
27K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
18K