Efficient Hot & Cold water combination for bathing

AI Thread Summary
Heating water to a higher temperature than necessary for bathing can lead to energy inefficiencies, as energy losses are proportional to temperature. The optimal approach is to heat water just enough to reach a comfortable bathing temperature, minimizing the need for cold water dilution. Calculations should focus on the mass of water rather than volume, as this affects energy expenditure. Insulating hot water tanks and pipes can further reduce heat loss, enhancing overall efficiency. Ultimately, generating water at the ideal temperature without excess heating is the most energy-efficient method for bathing.
djsourabh
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Generally for bathing purpose, we heat water to higher temperature say T1 than the temperature at which body is comfortable say T0 (is T0 = 70 degree Celsius?) & add some quantity of cold water to it to have the temperature of water = T0. Is the process energy efficient?
What is the best combination of hot & cold water (quantities & temperature) so that least amount of energy is spent?
eg, say we require 10 litres of water at temp T0 for comfortable bathing.
So how do we do it, heat 7 litres of water to temp T1 & add 3 litres of cold water at temp T2 to get 10 litres of water at temp T0. But this may not be the energy efficient combination, we might heat 10 litres of water to T0 & spend lesser energy than the above case. So what are the equations & how to know which would be the best combination?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Energy losses are proportional to temperature. The basic principle here should be to generate water that is just hot enough for use without needing to dilute with cold water. This is especially true where hot water is stored for some time waiting for use. This also has the safety advantage of not scalding children.

The only reason to run at a higher temperature than needed is when the capacity of the storage is less than the volume of hot water immediately required.

I believe your mixing calculations should be based on the mass of water, not on volume.
 
Baluncore said:
Energy losses are proportional to temperature. The basic principle here should be to generate water that is just hot enough for use without needing to dilute with cold water This is especially true where hot water is stored for some time waiting for use. This also has the safety advantage of not scalding children.

The only reason to run at a higher temperature than needed is when the capacity of the storage is less than the volume of hot water immediately required.

I believe your mixing calculations should be based on the mass of water, not on volume.

Do you mean that we spend least energy in the case you mentioned? (The basic principle here should be to generate water that is just hot enough for use without needing to dilute with cold water) ?? It will be very helpful if I get equations to support that.
 
Yes, just warm enough is more efficient than hot.
It is probably best analysed from the lost energy viewpoint.

The hotter the water in the reservoir is, the faster it will lose heat. It will do that even if you do not use any water. That is a major inefficiency. Get better thermal insulation on the tank.

When you use hot water it passes along a pipe that absorbs heat and then radiates proportional to the elevation in temperature. Use low thermal capacity pipe material and insulate all hot water pipes.

If you use a greater volume of warm water, than if it were hotter, it will still only heat the pipe to a lower water temperature once. If small quantities of water are used often, pipe thermal loss will be significant. Put the hot water reservoir near the kitchen sink. The distance to a bath or shower can be greater since, more water is used, less often.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Back
Top