Efficient Integration: v/(v^2 + 4) Simplified

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aaron Curran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the integration of the function v/(v^2 + 4). A participant initially confuses the integration of 1/(v^2 + 4) with ln(v^2 + 4) but later realizes the error. Another participant corrects the terminology, emphasizing the importance of using "numerator" and "denominator." The correct approach to integration is highlighted, indicating that differentiating ln(v^2 + 4) does not yield 1/(v^2 + 4), clarifying the misunderstanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with integration techniques
  • Knowledge of differentiation and logarithmic functions
  • Proficiency in mathematical terminology, specifically "numerator" and "denominator"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study integration techniques for rational functions
  • Learn about the properties of logarithmic differentiation
  • Explore the application of the chain rule in calculus
  • Review common mistakes in calculus terminology and notation
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone looking to improve their understanding of integration and differentiation concepts.

Aaron Curran
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Member warned about posting without the homework template
I know that if it were 1/(v2+4) then it would be ln(v2+4) but the other v in the numberator is throwing me off, any help would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, I figured it out!
 
Aaron Curran said:
I know that if it were 1/(v2+4) then it would be ln(v2+4)

No, it wouldn't. Can you see why?

but the other v in the numberator is throwing me off, any help would be much appreciated!

There is no such thing as a "numberator". The proper terms for the parts of a fraction are "numerator" and "denominator". You should have learned this long before starting calculus.
 
SteamKing said:
No, it wouldn't. Can you see why?
There is no such thing as a "numberator". The proper terms for the parts of a fraction are "numerator" and "denominator". You should have learned this long before starting calculus.

It was a typo haha, I've worked it out now anyway, feel very stupid for making this thread :sorry:
 
Aaron Curran said:
I know that if it were 1/(v2+4) then it would be ln(v2+4)
No, that is incorrect. You can verify what I said by differentiating ln(v2 + 4), which does not result in 1/(v2 + 4).
Aaron Curran said:
but the other v in the numberator is throwing me off, any help would be much appreciated!
 
Don't tell us you have got the answer, tell us the answer you have got!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K