Efficient Techniques for Solving Integrals: Quick and Simple Approach

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quinzio
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding efficient techniques for solving the integral ∫_{0}^{x} (x-t)e^{m(x-t)}cos(at) dt. A suggestion is made to utilize the relationship (x-t)e^{m(x-t)} = ∂/∂m e^{m(x-t)} to simplify the integral. Additionally, the equivalence of two double integral forms is confirmed, emphasizing that they represent the same mathematical concept but may require careful handling of limits when switching the order of integration. The use of Euler's identity is recommended for simplifying the cosine term in the integral. Overall, the conversation highlights strategies for tackling complex integrals effectively.
Quinzio
Messages
557
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I'm trying to solve an integral, but I can't reach the book result.
I've done my work, I filled 4 sheets with integrals, but somewhere I make a mistake.

I just ask, if there a quick short way to solve the integral, to tell me or show me.

\int_{0}^{x} (x-t)e^{m(x-t)}cos(at) dtI have another question...
is this
\int_{0}^{x}du\int_{0}^{u} e^{m(x-t)}cos(at) dt

equivalent to ...

\int_{0}^{x}\int_{0}^{u} e^{m(x-t)}cos(at) dt du

Can I move the variable in an out the integral ?
Is the first form just a way to explicit which varibale belongs to which integration bounds ?

Homework Equations


NA

The Attempt at a Solution


NA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To avoid complications consider \int t e^t \cos t \dt and integrate by parts (u = t,\mbox{d}v=e^t \cos t\, \mbox{d} t). The result is awful, though.
 
Quinzio said:
I have another question...
is this
\int_{0}^{x}du\int_{0}^{u} e^{m(x-t)}cos(at) dt

equivalent to ...

\int_{0}^{x}\int_{0}^{u} e^{m(x-t)}cos(at) dt du

Can I move the variable in an out the integral ?
Is the first form just a way to explicit which varibale belongs to which integration bounds ?

I'm no analyst but I would say yes. They are exactly the same and just different ways of expressing the double integral: you have an inner integral function f(u). The outer integral then integrates that function over it's bounds. Note if you switched the order of integration, say to dudt, then some changes to the limits would usually be needed. Left that to the interested reader.
 
One thing you might try is using the fact that

(x-t)e^{m(x-t)} = \frac{\partial}{\partial m} e^{m(x-t)}

so that

\int_{0}^{x} (x-t)e^{m(x-t)}\cos(at)\,dt = \int_{0}^{x} \frac{\partial}{\partial m}e^{m(x-t)}\cos(at)\,dt = \frac{\partial}{\partial m}\int_{0}^{x} e^{m(x-t)}\cos(at)\,dt

Also, use em(x-t) = emxe-mt and pull the factor emx out of the integral.
 
I would use Euler's identity and solve for cos:

\cos \alpha = \frac{e^{i\alpha} + e^{-i\alpha}}{2}.

The resulting integrals are easily done by parts.

As for the second question about moving differentials, it's find as long as you do the integration in the appropriate order and don't confuse limits.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K