Efficient Techniques for Solving Integrals: Quick and Simple Approach

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quinzio
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving integrals, specifically focusing on the integral \(\int_{0}^{x} (x-t)e^{m(x-t)}\cos(at) dt\) and the equivalence of two forms of double integrals. Participants are exploring efficient techniques and clarifying the relationships between different integral expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find a quicker method to solve the integral and questions the equivalence of two integral forms. Some participants suggest integration by parts and the use of Euler's identity, while others discuss the implications of changing the order of integration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring various approaches to the integral problem and discussing the properties of double integrals. Some guidance has been offered regarding the manipulation of integrals and the use of differentiation under the integral sign, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive method or solution.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about their calculations and seeks clarification on integral equivalences, indicating a potential lack of confidence in their understanding of the material.

Quinzio
Messages
557
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I'm trying to solve an integral, but I can't reach the book result.
I've done my work, I filled 4 sheets with integrals, but somewhere I make a mistake.

I just ask, if there a quick short way to solve the integral, to tell me or show me.

[tex]\int_{0}^{x} (x-t)e^{m(x-t)}cos(at) dt[/tex]I have another question...
is this
[tex]\int_{0}^{x}du\int_{0}^{u} e^{m(x-t)}cos(at) dt[/tex]

equivalent to ...

[tex]\int_{0}^{x}\int_{0}^{u} e^{m(x-t)}cos(at) dt du[/tex]

Can I move the variable in an out the integral ?
Is the first form just a way to explicit which varibale belongs to which integration bounds ?

Homework Equations


NA

The Attempt at a Solution


NA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To avoid complications consider [tex]\int t e^t \cos t \dt[/tex] and integrate by parts ([tex]u = t[/tex],[tex]\mbox{d}v=e^t \cos t\, \mbox{d} t[/tex]). The result is awful, though.
 
Quinzio said:
I have another question...
is this
[tex]\int_{0}^{x}du\int_{0}^{u} e^{m(x-t)}cos(at) dt[/tex]

equivalent to ...

[tex]\int_{0}^{x}\int_{0}^{u} e^{m(x-t)}cos(at) dt du[/tex]

Can I move the variable in an out the integral ?
Is the first form just a way to explicit which varibale belongs to which integration bounds ?

I'm no analyst but I would say yes. They are exactly the same and just different ways of expressing the double integral: you have an inner integral function f(u). The outer integral then integrates that function over it's bounds. Note if you switched the order of integration, say to dudt, then some changes to the limits would usually be needed. Left that to the interested reader.
 
One thing you might try is using the fact that

[tex](x-t)e^{m(x-t)} = \frac{\partial}{\partial m} e^{m(x-t)}[/tex]

so that

[tex]\int_{0}^{x} (x-t)e^{m(x-t)}\cos(at)\,dt = \int_{0}^{x} \frac{\partial}{\partial m}e^{m(x-t)}\cos(at)\,dt = \frac{\partial}{\partial m}\int_{0}^{x} e^{m(x-t)}\cos(at)\,dt[/tex]

Also, use em(x-t) = emxe-mt and pull the factor emx out of the integral.
 
I would use Euler's identity and solve for cos:

[tex]\cos \alpha = \frac{e^{i\alpha} + e^{-i\alpha}}{2}.[/tex]

The resulting integrals are easily done by parts.

As for the second question about moving differentials, it's find as long as you do the integration in the appropriate order and don't confuse limits.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K