Eigenvalue problem with nonlocal condition

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an eigenvalue problem characterized by a second-order differential equation with specific boundary and nonlocal conditions. Participants explore the implications of these conditions, particularly focusing on the case when the eigenvalue λ is greater than zero. The conversation includes attempts to simplify the problem and understand the behavior of the function under the given constraints.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an eigenvalue problem involving a second-order differential equation and a nonlocal condition, expressing difficulty in simplifying the positive and negative parts of the function when λ > 0.
  • Another participant suggests that the general solution to the differential equation can be expressed in terms of sine and cosine functions, leading to a specific form when applying the boundary condition u(0) = 0.
  • It is noted that any value of the constant C1 will satisfy the nonlocal condition if the sine function meets it, prompting a focus on determining the appropriate values of λ.
  • A participant acknowledges the complexity of the second condition and the need to split the function into positive and negative parts, indicating that the number of zeros depends on λ.
  • Further clarification is provided on how the zeros of the cosine function relate to intervals of positivity and negativity, with specific intervals identified based on λ.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the insights shared, indicating that the discussion has been helpful in understanding the problem better.
  • A later reply reflects on the nature of eigenvectors and their magnitudes, suggesting that arbitrary magnitudes could indicate an underlying issue.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the form of the solution and the implications of the boundary condition, but the discussion remains unresolved regarding the simplification of the nonlocal condition and the behavior of the function based on varying λ values.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the integration of the positive and negative parts of the function and the implications of the number of zeros on the overall solution. There are also unresolved aspects related to the nonlocal condition and its dependence on the function's behavior.

kajzlik
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello guys, suppose we have an eigenvalue problem
[tex] \left\{<br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> u'' + λu = 0, \quad x \in (0,\pi) \\<br /> u(0)=0 \quad \\<br /> \left( \int_0^\pi \! {(u^+)}^2 \, \mathrm{d}x \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} = \left( \int_0^\pi \! {(u^-)}^4 \, \mathrm{d}x \right)^\frac {1}{4}<br /> <br /> \end{array}<br /> \right.<br /> [/tex]
where [tex]u^+, u^-[/tex] is positive, negative part of function respectively.
I'm having troubles with case when λ> 0. Is there any way how to simplify or express these parts of function ? I've tried some (analytic) brute force methods, tried to simplify that first but still no valuable result.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What if you use that the general solution to

[tex]u^{\prime\prime} + \lambda u =0[/tex]

is always of the form

[tex]u(x) = C_1\sin(\sqrt{\lambda}x) + C_2\cos(\sqrt{\lambda}x)[/tex]

for ##\lambda>0##. Then from ##u(0) = 0##, you can deduce that

[tex]C_2=0[/tex]

So your function has the form

[tex]u(x) = C_1 \sin(\sqrt{\lambda}x)[/tex]

Now figuring out what ##C_1## is from the last condition seems tedious, but not all too difficult.
 
Hmm, thinking about it, any value of ##C_1## will satisfy the last condition, at least if ##f(x) = \sin(\sqrt{\lambda}x)## satisfies it. So your only job is to find out for which ##\lambda## this is true.
 
Thanks for your response.
The formulation of my problem was quite confusing. First condition is ok, its just straight forward process that leads to sine function, but I'm completely lost with the second one.As you said it's obvious that second condition will hold for any "multiplying" constant.

These positive / negative parts of function are bit tricky for me. Since number of zeros depends on λ( and then number of positive and negative parts of sine too), I have to split that function somehow and do piecewise integration.Thats the problem. Still seems something is "hidden" for me and I'm sure that will be obvious, but I can't figure it out now.
I'm not asking for solution, but I would really appreciate some hint ;)
Thanks
 
Last edited:
You have already determined, from the equation and the condition that y(0)= 0, that [itex]y= Csin(\sqrt{\lambda} x)[/itex]. Yes, the number of zeros and the number of intervals where y is positive or negative depend upon [itex]\lambda[/itex] but it is not all that difficult to determine. For a given [itex]\lambda[/itex], [itex]cos(\sqrt{\lambda}x)[/itex] will be 0 at [itex](n\pi)/\sqrt{\lambda}[/itex]. It will be positive on the interval from [itex](2n\pi)/\sqrt{\lambda}[/itex] to [itex]((2n+1)\pi)/\sqrt{\lambda}[/itex] and negative on the interval from [itex]((2n+1)\pi)/\sqrt{\lambda}[/itex] to [itex](2(n+1)\pi)/\sqrt{\lambda}[/itex] for any positive integer n.
 
Well, not that difficult... Thank you, it really helped.
 
micromass said:
Hmm, thinking about it, any value of ##C_1## will satisfy the last condition

That shouldn't be a surprise. If the magnitude of an eigenvector is NOT arbitrary, there is something very strange going on!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K