Eigenvalues and operators, step the involves switching and substitutin

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rwooduk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues Operators
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the eigenvalues of the operator C in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the manipulation of wavefunctions and the substitution of eigenvalues. Participants explore the implications of switching ket vectors and the introduction of the eigenvalue p in the context of the operator and wavefunction.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the operator C and the wavefunction PSI, expressing confusion about the step where p is substituted and the ket vectors switch places.
  • Another participant questions the meaning of p and the overall goal of the calculation, seeking clarification on the source of information being used.
  • A participant clarifies that p represents the eigenvalues of operator C, which are +1 and -1, and discusses the switching of ket vectors in the context of the eigenvalue equation.
  • Several participants note that Q and V are treated as numbers, and they discuss the implications of the eigenvalue equation C|PSI> = p|PSI> for the manipulation of the wavefunction.
  • One participant acknowledges a missed detail in the solution regarding the eigenvalue equation and expresses uncertainty about the switching of ket vectors.
  • Another participant provides a detailed explanation of how the eigenvalue equation leads to the relationships between Q, V, and p, emphasizing the linear independence of the basis vectors.
  • A later reply indicates that one participant has gained clarity on the topic after the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the manipulation of the wavefunction and the role of the eigenvalue p. While some clarify the definitions and implications, others remain uncertain about specific steps, particularly the switching of ket vectors.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the assumptions underlying the manipulation of the wavefunction and the definitions of the terms involved. The discussion reflects a range of interpretations and understandings of the eigenvalue problem in quantum mechanics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners of quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in eigenvalue problems and the mathematical treatment of operators and wavefunctions.

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
Operator C = I+><-I + I-><+I

Wavefunction PSI = Q I+> +V I->

C PSI = Q I-> + V I+>

note the I is just a straight line (BRAKET vectors), the next step is where I get confused, p is subbed in and the ket vectors switch places...

C PSI = pQ I+> + pV I-> <---- why??

therefore

V = pQ and Q = pV

which gives p^2 Q = Q therefore p = +/- 1

why can p be subbed in and the ket vectors switch around, i.e. I-> no longer with Q and I+> no longer with V

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rwooduk said:
C PSI = pQ I+> + pV I-> <---- why??
What is p? What are you even trying to do? What source of information are you using?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Hi, I am reviewing last semesters quantum mechanics, the complete question is:

Determine the eigenvalues of the operator C = I+><-I + I-><+I. You may use PSI = Q I+> + V I-> as an eigenvector.

so p would be the eigenvalues of the operator C which are +1 and -1

the solution introduces p to C PSI = Q I-> + V I+> by switching the ket vectors around and putting p with each term, I don't understand why this is.

thanks for the reply
 
rwooduk said:
Operator C = I+><-I + I-><+I

Wavefunction PSI = Q I+> +V I->

C PSI = Q I-> + V I+>

note the I is just a straight line (BRAKET vectors), the next step is where I get confused, p is subbed in and the ket vectors switch places...

C PSI = pQ I+> + pV I-> <---- why??

therefore

V = pQ and Q = pV

which gives p^2 Q = Q therefore p = +/- 1

why can p be subbed in and the ket vectors switch around, i.e. I-> no longer with Q and I+> no longer with V

thanks
Please don't write I. There's a vertical line on the keyboard that you can use. Or you can copy and paste this one: |

I assume that Q and V are just numbers. What is p and how did it enter the calculation?

Oh wait, p is the eigenvalue, right? Then by definition of eigenvalue and eigenvector, you have ##C|\psi\rangle =p|\psi\rangle##. Now you can just use the definition of ##|\psi\rangle## to get
$$C|\psi\rangle =p|\psi\rangle =p(Q|+\rangle+V|-\rangle)=pQ|+\rangle+pV|-\rangle.$$ Since you already know that
$$C|\psi\rangle=Q|-\rangle+V|+\rangle,$$ this implies that pQ=V and pV=Q.
 
Last edited:
Fredrik said:
Please don't write I. There's a vertical line on the keyboard that you can use. Or you can copy and paste this one: |

I assume that Q and V are just numbers. What is p and how did it enter the calculation?

oh dear I missed something in the solution:

Recall the eigenvalue equation: C |PSI> = p |PSI>

that would explain where the p comes from, but it doesn't explain why the ket vectors switch around... or does it?

Yes Q and V are just numbers.

Apologies on the I.
 
rwooduk said:
oh dear I missed something in the solution:

Recall the eigenvalue equation: C |PSI> = p |PSI>

that would explain where the p comes from, but it doesn't explain why the ket vectors switch around... or does it?

Yes Q and V are just numbers.

Apologies on the I.
If p is the eigenvalue, then by definition of eigenvalue and eigenvector, you have ##C|\psi\rangle =p|\psi\rangle##. Now you can just use the definition of ##|\psi\rangle## to get
$$C|\psi\rangle =p|\psi\rangle =p\big(Q|+\rangle+V|-\rangle\big)=pQ|+\rangle+pV|-\rangle.$$ Since you already know that
$$C|\psi\rangle=Q|-\rangle+V|+\rangle,$$ this implies that
$$(pQ-V)|+\rangle +(pV-Q)|-\rangle=0.$$ Since the basis vectors are linearly independent, this implies that pQ-V=0 and pV-Q=0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Fredrik said:
If p is the eigenvalue, then by definition of eigenvalue and eigenvector, you have ##C|\psi\rangle =p|\psi\rangle##. Now you can just use the definition of ##|\psi\rangle## to get
$$C|\psi\rangle =p|\psi\rangle =p\big(Q|+\rangle+V|-\rangle\big)=pQ|+\rangle+pV|-\rangle.$$ Since you already know that
$$C|\psi\rangle=Q|-\rangle+V|+\rangle,$$ this implies that
$$(pQ-V)|+\rangle +(pV-Q)|-\rangle=0.$$ Since the basis vectors are linearly independent, this implies that pQ-V=0 and pV-Q=0.

Ahhh I see now, that's great! Thanks very much for your time, really appreciated!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K