Eigenvectors of first-order differential equation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the eigenvector equation f' = T(f) = λf, leading to the solution f(t) = ce^(λt). It clarifies that every real number λ is an eigenvalue of T, with corresponding eigenvectors of the form ce^(λt) for non-zero c. A participant questions the integration step leading to ln(f), mistakenly thinking it should yield t/f instead. The response explains that the integral of f'/f indeed equals ln(f) due to the chain rule, affirming the correctness of the original statement. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between eigenvalues, eigenvectors, and first-order differential equations.
jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Suppose that f is an eigenvector of T with corresponding eigenvalue \lambda. Then f' = T(f) = \lambdaf. This is a first-order differential equation whose solutions are of the form f(t) = ce^(\lambda*t) for some scalar constant c. Consequently, every real number \lambda is an eigenvalue of T, and \lambda corresponds to eigenvectors of the form ce^(\lambda*t ) for c not equal to 0. Note that for \lambda = 0, the eigenvectors are the nonzero constant functions.

Question: I was wondering if someone could explain the following sentence from above: "This is a first-order differential equation whose solutions are of the form f(t) = ce^(\lambda * t) for some scalar constant c. "

Work:
f ' = T(F) = \lambdaf.
Therefore, f ' = \lambda f ==> f' / f = \lambda
So, [Integral] f ' / f dt = [Integral] \lambda dt
Therefore, ln(f) = \lambdat + c
<==> e^( ln(f) ) = e^( \lambdat + c )
= e^l^n^|^f^| = e ^ ( \lambdat + c )
= e^ce^( \lambda * t )
<==> f = e^ce^( \lambda * t ) which does not equal ce^( lambda * t ) ??

Question: I'm kind of rusty with calculus but I didn't think [Integral] f &#039; / f dt = ln(f)
I thought it would be [Integral] f &#039; / f dt = [Integral] 1 / f dt = t / f
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jeff1evesque! :smile:

(have a lambda: λ and an integral: ∫ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
jeff1evesque said:
… f = e^ce^( \lambda * t ) which does not equal ce^( lambda * t ) ??

Yes it does … the constant ec has simply been renamed c :wink:
Question: I'm kind of rusty with calculus but I didn't think [Integral] f &#039; / f dt = ln(f)
I thought it would be [Integral] f &#039; / f dt = [Integral] 1 / f dt = t / f

∫f/'f dt = ln(f) + c because d/dt (ln(t)) = 1/t, so by the chain rule d/dt (ln(f(t))) = f'(t)/f(t) :wink:
 
Wow, thanks a lot Tim.

tiny-tim said:
Hi jeff1evesque! :smile:

(have a lambda: λ and an integral: ∫ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)


Yes it does … the constant ec has simply been renamed c :wink:


∫f/'f dt = ln(f) + c because d/dt (ln(t)) = 1/t, so by the chain rule d/dt (ln(f(t))) = f'(t)/f(t) :wink:
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K