A Eigenvectors of the Permittivity Tensor in Periodic Dielectrics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the eigenvectors of the effective permittivity tensor in periodic dielectrics and the principal axes of crystal symmetry. The original poster seeks a formal proof that these eigenvectors align with the crystal symmetry, noting consistency with their simulations. A response suggests that this alignment may not always hold true, particularly in cases involving strained crystal lattices or chiral phases. The original poster later references Neumann's principle, which implies that the symmetry of physical properties must reflect the crystal's point group symmetry, but acknowledges potential limitations to materials described by symmetric tensors. The conversation highlights the complexity of this relationship in various material contexts.
sph711
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Looking for a derivation or proof that the eigenvectors of the effective permittivity tensor of a periodic dielectric structure align with the principal axis of the crystal symmetry of said periodic strucutre.
Hi all,
(first post here :D)

I am working on periodic dielectric structures in the long-wavelength limit (wavelength much larger than the periodicity). In the long wavelength limit the periodic strucutre can be homogonized and described via an effective permittivity (or refractive index) tensor.

I think it would make sense that the eigenvectors of said homogenized permittivity tensor would correspond to the principal axis of the crystal symmetry of the periodic structures. This also corresponds well with what I am seeing in my simulations. However, I cannot think of a way to show this formally.

Could anybody point me to an existing proof or guide me in how to approach the problem mathematically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sph711 said:
TL;DR Summary: Looking for a derivation or proof that the eigenvectors of the effective permittivity tensor of a periodic dielectric structure align with the principal axis of the crystal symmetry of said periodic strucutre.
Interesting question!

I'm not sure this is always true, I'm thinking about acousto-optic devices (with strained crystal lattices), and also chiral phases (especially liquid crystals). I can't find a reference either though, perhaps this one will give you some ideas:

https://opg.optica.org/directpdfacc...-17-6-4442.pdf?da=1&id=177143&seq=0&mobile=no
 
Andy Resnick said:
Interesting question!

I'm not sure this is always true, I'm thinking about acousto-optic devices (with strained crystal lattices), and also chiral phases (especially liquid crystals). I can't find a reference either though, perhaps this one will give you some ideas:

https://opg.optica.org/directpdfacc...-17-6-4442.pdf?da=1&id=177143&seq=0&mobile=no
Thank you for your reply. However, the link you provide did not work for me

I did some more research today, and I think I found what I was looking for. I came across the Neumanns principle which states "The symmetry of any physical property of a crystal must include the symmetry elements of the point group of the crystal." (properties of materials, Robert E Newnham - page 35 -

[Link to PDF of copyrighted textbook deleted by the Mentors]

If I understand it correctly this should mean that yes, the principle axis of the crystal are the same as the Eigenvectors of material properties, there is also an analytical form of this principle in the link above. But I did not have time yet to go through it.

However, I think you are right, this should not always be the case. I might be wrong, but I think it is limited to mateirals that can be described with a symmetric tensor. Will update as soon as I am sure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top