A Eigenvectors of the Permittivity Tensor in Periodic Dielectrics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the eigenvectors of the effective permittivity tensor in periodic dielectrics and the principal axes of crystal symmetry. The original poster seeks a formal proof that these eigenvectors align with the crystal symmetry, noting consistency with their simulations. A response suggests that this alignment may not always hold true, particularly in cases involving strained crystal lattices or chiral phases. The original poster later references Neumann's principle, which implies that the symmetry of physical properties must reflect the crystal's point group symmetry, but acknowledges potential limitations to materials described by symmetric tensors. The conversation highlights the complexity of this relationship in various material contexts.
sph711
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
Looking for a derivation or proof that the eigenvectors of the effective permittivity tensor of a periodic dielectric structure align with the principal axis of the crystal symmetry of said periodic strucutre.
Hi all,
(first post here :D)

I am working on periodic dielectric structures in the long-wavelength limit (wavelength much larger than the periodicity). In the long wavelength limit the periodic strucutre can be homogonized and described via an effective permittivity (or refractive index) tensor.

I think it would make sense that the eigenvectors of said homogenized permittivity tensor would correspond to the principal axis of the crystal symmetry of the periodic structures. This also corresponds well with what I am seeing in my simulations. However, I cannot think of a way to show this formally.

Could anybody point me to an existing proof or guide me in how to approach the problem mathematically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sph711 said:
TL;DR Summary: Looking for a derivation or proof that the eigenvectors of the effective permittivity tensor of a periodic dielectric structure align with the principal axis of the crystal symmetry of said periodic strucutre.
Interesting question!

I'm not sure this is always true, I'm thinking about acousto-optic devices (with strained crystal lattices), and also chiral phases (especially liquid crystals). I can't find a reference either though, perhaps this one will give you some ideas:

https://opg.optica.org/directpdfacc...-17-6-4442.pdf?da=1&id=177143&seq=0&mobile=no
 
Andy Resnick said:
Interesting question!

I'm not sure this is always true, I'm thinking about acousto-optic devices (with strained crystal lattices), and also chiral phases (especially liquid crystals). I can't find a reference either though, perhaps this one will give you some ideas:

https://opg.optica.org/directpdfacc...-17-6-4442.pdf?da=1&id=177143&seq=0&mobile=no
Thank you for your reply. However, the link you provide did not work for me

I did some more research today, and I think I found what I was looking for. I came across the Neumanns principle which states "The symmetry of any physical property of a crystal must include the symmetry elements of the point group of the crystal." (properties of materials, Robert E Newnham - page 35 -

[Link to PDF of copyrighted textbook deleted by the Mentors]

If I understand it correctly this should mean that yes, the principle axis of the crystal are the same as the Eigenvectors of material properties, there is also an analytical form of this principle in the link above. But I did not have time yet to go through it.

However, I think you are right, this should not always be the case. I might be wrong, but I think it is limited to mateirals that can be described with a symmetric tensor. Will update as soon as I am sure.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top