I've got a problem which is asking for the eigenvalues and eigenstates of the Hamiltonian [itex] H_0=-B_0(a_1 \sigma_z^{(1)}+a_2 \sigma_z^{(2)}) [/itex] for a system consisting of two spin half particles in the magnetic field [itex] \vec{B}=B_0 \hat z [/itex].(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

But I think the problem is wrong and no eigenstate and eigenvalue exist. Here's my reason:

[itex]

-B_0(a_1 \sigma_z^{(1)}+a_2 \sigma_z^{(2)}) \left(\begin{array}{c}x_1\\y_1 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}x_2\\y_2 \end{array}\right) =\lambda\left(\begin{array}{c}x_1\\y_1 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}x_2\\y_2\end{array}\right) \Rightarrow -B_0(a_1 \left(\begin{array}{c}x_1\\-y_1 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}x_2\\y_2 \end{array}\right)+a_2 \left(\begin{array}{c}x_1\\y_1 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}x_2\\-y_2 \end{array}\right)) =\lambda\left(\begin{array}{c}x_1\\y_1 \end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}x_2\\y_2\end{array}\right)

[/itex]

But as far as I know, that is impossible. Am I right?

I'm asking this because I'm affraid maybe my knowledge on tensor product states and operators contain some holes because I learnt it by reading little things here and there.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Eigenvectors of this Hamiltonian

Loading...

Similar Threads - Eigenvectors Hamiltonian | Date |
---|---|

I Eigenvectors - eigenvalues mappings in QM | Jan 1, 2018 |

I SO(3) rotation of eigenvectors | Nov 22, 2016 |

I Hamiltonian matrix - Eigenvectors | Nov 9, 2016 |

I Eigenvalues, eigenvectors and the expansion theorem | Sep 17, 2016 |

Eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian | Aug 31, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**