Einstein Eq. & Stiffness of Spacetime

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sonderval
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space Stiffness
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the Einstein equation in relation to the concept of the "stiffness" of spacetime, particularly in the context of stresses and deformations in spacetime. Participants explore the implications of these ideas, referencing both popular science sources and theoretical frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests a connection between the elastic modulus of spacetime and Einstein's constant, proposing that calculations may involve perturbations of flat spacetime.
  • Another participant expresses a desire for more detailed sources beyond social media.
  • Some participants question the physical meaning of the stiffness of spacetime, drawing parallels to Hooke's law and discussing the relationship between stress and strain in the context of the Einstein equation.
  • A participant critiques the credibility of the source discussing the stiffness of spacetime, noting that it comes from a popular science writer rather than a scientist.
  • Concerns are raised about the interpretation of stress in the Einstein equation, with one participant arguing that it refers to stress in material bodies rather than spacetime itself.
  • There is a mention of historical attempts to conceptualize spacetime as an elastic medium, with a humorous reference to calculating the "Viscosity of Free Space."
  • One participant dismisses a referenced approach as being from a "crackpot journal," suggesting that it lacks scientific validity.
  • Overall, participants express skepticism about the mainstream acceptance of the idea of spacetime stiffness, indicating a lack of substantial evidence or consensus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express skepticism about the concept of spacetime stiffness and its scientific validity, with multiple competing views on the interpretation of stress and strain in the Einstein equation. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the reliance on popular science sources and the absence of rigorous scientific literature to support claims about the stiffness of spacetime. There is also ambiguity regarding the definitions of stress and strain as they relate to spacetime.

Sonderval
Messages
234
Reaction score
11
Looking at the Einstein equation, stresses can cause a deformation of space time.
This link here
https://twitter.com/anilananth/status/339030628181868544
gives a value for the elastic modulus ("stiffness") of spacetime.
I think that the value of 10^24GPa must be related to Einstein's constant 8 pi G/c^4 - I suspect that one uses the equations for a small perturbation of flat spacetime (as Misner Thorne Wheeler, eq. 18.8b) to calculate this, but I don't see how it is done exactly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be helpful to have a source with more detail than twitter.
 
Yes it would, but that's all I have found...
 
I think this is just an example of the party game, Planck Scale Fun.

Take any physical quantity (pressure, say). Out of the Planck Mass, Length and Time, construct a unit with those dimensions. Then marvel about how large/small that unit is. :wink:
 
But isn't there a physical meaning to it?
After all, the rhs of the linearised Einstein equation contains a stress (in the T_ij-part of the tensor), the lhs a change in the metric (which is similar to an elastic strain, it is a chenge of length relative to a length).
So I think it should be posisble to re-write things in a way similar to Hooke's law - at least that is what I thought when I read "stiffness of space". Or is this too simplistic?
 
OK, more seriously.. This guy Anil Ananthaswamy is not a scientist, he's a popular science writer. Even if he had a valid point to make, Twitter is not the place of choice to publish it, I think! :eek:

Secondly, isn't it just a naming coincidence - the "stress" Tij in Einstein's Equation is the stress in a material body, not some stress being applied to spacetime. And the "strain" hμν generally results from T00 rather than Tij. Also it is a nonlocal effect - stress here produces strain over there.

There always have been attempts to imagine spacetime as some kind of elastic medium. I know when our class first learned about the dragging of inertial frames near a rotating body, we used to joke about calculating the "Viscosity of Free Space". :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
@Bill_K
So even in this interpretation it is matter being stressed that causes a "strain" (change in the metric), but it is not spacetime that is "stressed" in any way.

"There always have been attempts to imagine spacetime as some kind of elastic medium."
I found this, for example
[crackpot link deleted]
Is this kind of approach meaningful?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That approach is in a crackpot journal. So it's unlikely that this kind of approach is meaningful.

Given that we have one source from twitter, one source from a crackpot journal, and nothing else, I have to conclude that this idea is not part of the scientific mainstream, so does not fit the PF mission. (To be fair, I think a better description is that we have something too vague to discuss)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 186 ·
7
Replies
186
Views
13K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K