# Einstein Model vs Debye model.

• PsychonautQQ
In summary, the Einstein model treats atoms as independent oscillators due to the assumed harmonicity of their forces, while the Debye model considers atoms as coupled oscillators with collective modes that are regarded as independent, also due to the assumed harmonicity. However, when the energy bands are flat, the Debye model reduces to the Einstein model.
PsychonautQQ
In the Einstein model, atoms are treated as independent oscillators. The Debye model on the other hand, treats atoms as coupled oscillators vibrating collectively. However, the collective modes are regarded here as independent. What is the meaning of this independence and how does it contrast with the Einstein model?

The independence of the oscillators is a consequence of the assumed harmonicity of the oscillators, i.e. the forces being linear functions of the displacements. Once anharmonic terms are considered, these will give rise to scattering of oscillations on each other which is among others one reason for the limited thermal conductivity of solids.

you mean in the Einstein model the independence is a consequence of assumed harmonicity of oscillators? Or in the Debye model the collective modes are regarded as independent because of the assumed harmonicity?

PsychonautQQ said:
you mean in the Einstein model the independence is a consequence of assumed harmonicity of oscillators? Or in the Debye model the collective modes are regarded as independent because of the assumed harmonicity?

In both models. Also note that the Debye model reduces to the Einstein model when the energy bands are flat as then you can construct localized oscillations from the degenerate oscillators. Often, the bands corresponding to optical phonons are not very curved so that they can be approximated by Einstein oscillators.

## 1. What are the key differences between the Einstein and Debye models?

The Einstein model assumes that all atoms in a solid vibrate with the same frequency, while the Debye model takes into account the different vibrational frequencies of atoms in a solid.

## 2. Which model is more accurate for describing the heat capacity of solids?

The Debye model is generally considered to be more accurate for describing the heat capacity of solids, especially at low temperatures.

## 3. How does the Einstein model account for the anharmonicity of vibrations?

The Einstein model does not account for anharmonicity, as it assumes that all vibrations are harmonic.

## 4. Can the Einstein and Debye models be used for all types of solids?

The Einstein and Debye models are both valid for solids with a well-defined lattice structure, but they may not accurately describe the heat capacity of amorphous or disordered solids.

## 5. How do the predictions of the Einstein and Debye models differ at high temperatures?

At high temperatures, the Einstein model predicts a constant heat capacity, while the Debye model predicts that the heat capacity will approach a linear increase with temperature.

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
884
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K