Questions on Debye's Model of solids

In summary, the conversation discusses Debye's model of solids and its differences from Einstein's model. It is based on the idea of a 1D chain of atoms coupled with springs, and considers a chain of N oscillators to have N vibrational modes in 1D and 3N in 3D. The energy of a mode is determined by the Bose-Einstein distribution and can be viewed as a simple harmonic oscillator. The concept of density of states is also introduced, which represents the number of chains of atoms occupying vibrational modes within a certain frequency range. The Debye model is a simplified version of a chain-of-atoms system, taking into account the atomic nature of matter and using the experimentally measured speed of sound
  • #1
WWCY
479
12
Hi all, I have a few questions related to Debye's model of solids. Any assistance is greatly appreciated.

##\textbf{1)}##
My current understanding is that unlike Einstein's model, he views a 1D solid as a chain of atoms similar not unlike a 1D chain of masses coupled with springs. Thus a chain of N oscillators has N vibrational modes in 1D and 3N in 3D. This means that we have taken the normal mode frequencies for longitudinal oscillations to be the same as those the transverse oscillations. Is this really the case (classically and quantum mechanically) or was the assumption made for simplicity?

##\textbf{2)}##
The energy for a mode of frequency ##\omega## is given by ##\hbar \omega (n_b(\beta \hbar \omega) + \frac{1}{2})##, with ##n_b## being the Bose-Einstein distribution, and telling us the average level of excitation for that particular mode. It was then implied that we can take the entire mode to be in itself a a) simple harmonic oscillator with b) the energy given above. What does he mean by a) and b)? Also with regards to 2), why does a chain of atoms have the same expression for energy as a single quantum harmonic oscillator? In classical mechanics we would have to sum the energy contributions of individual masses (and spring constants) to get the total energy of the system.

##\textbf{3)}##
It was then stated that we could also view each mode as a boson of frequency ##\omega## occupied on average ##n_b## times. Why do we take a mode, which really is the vibration of a chain of atoms, as a single particle? Or was this meant as an analogy rather than a literal interpretation? Also, what does it mean for a boson to be "occupied" ##n_b## times?

##\textbf{4)}## Later the concept of the density of states ##g(\omega)## was introduced. Am I right in saying that ##g(\omega) \ d\omega## can be interpreted as the number of chains of atoms in the considered solid occupying vibrational modes between frequencies ##\omega## and ##\omega + d\omega##?

PS I have not studied Statistical Mechanics (that comes in the future) and thus am unfamiliar with the Bose-Einstein distribution and properties of Bosons.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think the Debye model of a solid is a simplified version of that chain-of-atoms system, and it assumes the crystal to be a continuum body and the oscillations being equivalent to sound waves. A lower limit is set to the wavelength of those mechanical waves, to partly take in account the atomic nature of matter. A good property of this model is that it allows the use of experimentally measured speed of sound in a material as an input parameter.
 

1. What is Debye's model of solids?

Debye's model is a theoretical model used to explain the behavior of solids at low temperatures. It takes into account the vibrations of atoms in a solid lattice and predicts the specific heat capacity of a solid material.

2. How does Debye's model differ from the classical model?

The classical model assumes that the atoms in a solid are fixed in place and do not vibrate. Debye's model takes into account the vibrational energy of atoms and the resulting changes in specific heat capacity at low temperatures.

3. What is the Debye temperature and why is it important?

The Debye temperature is a characteristic temperature for a solid material that represents the maximum temperature at which it can be treated as a classical solid. It is important because it helps to determine the validity of Debye's model for a particular material.

4. How does Debye's model account for the specific heat capacity of solids at high temperatures?

Debye's model predicts that at high temperatures, the specific heat capacity of a solid material will approach the classical value as the vibrations of atoms become more random and less coherent.

5. What are the limitations of Debye's model?

Debye's model is limited in its ability to accurately predict the behavior of solids at very low temperatures and for materials with complex crystal structures. It also does not take into account quantum effects, which are important for certain materials like metals.

Similar threads

  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
859
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
789
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
3
Views
7K
Back
Top