Einstein Tensor - Particle at rest?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving the Einstein tensor and the behavior of a particle at rest. Participants work through finding the Christoffel symbols, demonstrating that a particle initially at rest remains at rest, and calculating the Ricci tensors. There is confusion regarding the application of the Euler-Lagrangian equations and the correct interpretation of the Christoffel symbols, particularly whether a factor of 1/2 is missing. The conversation emphasizes the need to show that all spatial derivatives of the particle's position are zero at the moment it is released to confirm it remains at rest.
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



(a)Find Christoffel symbols
(b) Show the particles are at rest, hence ##t= \tau##. Find the Ricci tensors
(c) Find zeroth component of Einstein Tensor

ricci3.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)[/B]

Let lagrangian be:
-c^2 \left( \frac{dt}{d\tau}\right)^2 + a^2 \left[ \left(\frac{dx}{d\tau}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dy}{d\tau}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dz}{d\tau}\right)^2 \right]

Euler-Lagrangian is given by:
\frac{d}{d\tau} \left( \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\frac{\partial x^{\gamma}}{\partial \tau})} \right) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial x^{\gamma}}

Applying Euler-Lagrangian to temporal part:
\frac{d}{d\tau} \left( -2c^2 \frac{dt}{d\tau} \right) = 2 a \dot a \left[ \left(\frac{dx}{d\tau}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dy}{d\tau}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dz}{d\tau}\right)^2 \right]

\frac{d^2 (ct)}{d\tau^2} + \frac{a \dot a}{c} \left[ \left(\frac{dx}{d\tau}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dy}{d\tau}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{dz}{d\tau}\right)^2 \right] = 0

This implies that ## \Gamma_{11}^0 = \Gamma_{22}^0 = \Gamma_{33}^0 = \frac{a \dot a}{c} ##.

Applying Euler-Lagrangian to spatial part:
\frac{d}{d\tau} \left( 2a^2 \frac{dx^{\gamma}}{d\tau} \right) = 0
2 a \dot a \frac{dt}{d\tau} \frac{dx^{\gamma}}{d\tau} + a^2 \frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2} = 0
\frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2} + \frac{2 \dot a}{a c} \frac{dx^{\gamma}}{d\tau} \frac{d (ct) }{d\tau} = 0

This implies that ## \Gamma_{10}^1 = \Gamma_{20}^2 = \Gamma_{30}^3 = \frac{2 \dot a}{ac}##. Am I missing a factor of ##\frac{1}{2}## somewhere or is the question wrong?

Part (b)

I can't see why the particle is at rest in this frame. From the transport equation, the change in vector ##V^{\mu}## when transported through length ##\delta x^{\beta}## is:

\delta V^{\mu} = -\Gamma_{\alpha \beta}^{\mu} V^{\alpha} \delta x^{\beta}

Letting ##\delta x^{\beta}## represent the time component and ##\alpha## represent the spatial component:

\frac{\delta V^{\mu}}{\delta x^{\beta}} = - \Gamma_{\alpha \beta}^{\mu} V^{\alpha}

The LHS represents 'velocity' while the right hand side represents ##\int \hat r dt##. The Christoffel symbols are clearly non-zero: ## \Gamma_{10}^1 = \Gamma_{20}^2 = \Gamma_{30}^3 = \frac{2 \dot a}{ac}##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2} + \frac{2 \dot a}{a c} \frac{dx^{\gamma}}{d\tau} \frac{d (ct) }{d\tau} = 0

This implies that ## \Gamma_{10}^1 = \Gamma_{20}^2 = \Gamma_{30}^3 = \frac{2 \dot a}{ac}##. Am I missing a factor of ##\frac{1}{2}## somewhere or is the question wrong?

Hint: Note that both ## \Gamma_{10}^1## and ## \Gamma_{01}^1## occur in the equations of motion ##\frac{d^2 x^1}{d\tau^2} + \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^1 \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} = 0## .
Part (b)

I can't see why the particle is at rest in this frame.

You need to show that a free particle that is initially at rest will remain at rest in this coordinate system. So, you need to show that when a particle is released at rest it's spatial acceleration ##\frac{d^2x^k}{dt^2} = 0##. See if you can show this from the equations of motion ##\frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2} + \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\gamma \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} = 0## and the known values of the Christoffel symbols.
 
TSny said:
Hint: Note that both ## \Gamma_{10}^1## and ## \Gamma_{01}^1## occur in the equations of motion ##\frac{d^2 x^1}{d\tau^2} + \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^1 \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} = 0## .You need to show that a free particle that is initially at rest will remain at rest in this coordinate system. So, you need to show that it's spatial acceleration ##\frac{d^2x^k}{dt^2} = 0##. See if you can show this from the equations of motion ##\frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2} + \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\gamma \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} = 0## and the known values of the Christoffel symbols.
Ah I see, so ## \frac{d^2 x^1}{d\tau^2} + \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^1 \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} = \frac{d^2 x^1}{d\tau^2} + \Gamma_{01}^1 \frac{dx^0}{d\tau} \frac{dx^1}{d\tau} + \Gamma_{10}^1 \frac{dx^1}{d\tau} \frac{dx^0}{d\tau}##

I have to show that the 'acceleration' is 0 by summing the RHS up and show it equals 0. Do I only sum over the spatial parts?

\frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2} = - \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\gamma \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau}

Spatial parts and temporal parts are:
\left( 3 \times a^2 \frac{\dot a}{ac} \right) - \left( 3 \times \frac{a \dot a}{c} \right) = 0

Why do I need to multiply the metric components in order to make this right?
 
Last edited:
unscientific said:
Ah I see, so ## \frac{d^2 x^1}{d\tau^2} + \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^1 \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} = \frac{d^2 x^1}{d\tau^2} + \Gamma_{01}^1 \frac{dx^0}{d\tau} \frac{dx^1}{d\tau} + \Gamma_{10}^1 \frac{dx^1}{d\tau} \frac{dx^0}{d\tau}##

I have to show that the 'acceleration' is 0 by summing the RHS up and show it equals 0. Do I only sum over the spatial parts?

\frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2} = - \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\gamma \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau}

Spatial parts and temporal parts are:
\left( 3 \times a^2 \frac{\dot a}{ac} \right) - \left( 3 \times \frac{a \dot a}{c} \right) = 0

Why do I need to multiply the metric components in order to make this right?

I didn't really follow your last equation here.

If the particle starts at rest at time t = 0, then the particle will remain at rest if you can show that all derivatives ##\frac{d^nx^k}{dt^n} = 0## at ##t = 0##. Here ##k =## 1, 2, or 3.

You can use your equation ##\frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2} = - \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\gamma \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} ## to first find an expression for ##\frac{d^2 x^k}{d \tau^2} ##. Then see if you can argue that ##\frac{d^2 x^k}{dt^2} = 0 ## at the instant the particle is released. Then try to show ##\frac{d^3x^k}{dt^3} = 0 ##, etc.

To relate derivatives with respect to ##\tau## to derivatives with respect to ##t##, it will be helpful to write out ##\frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2} = - \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\gamma \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} ## for ##\gamma = 0## and keep in mind that we are considering the instant when the particle is released from rest.

I'm not claiming that the above procedure is the quickest way to the result. It's just a way that I think will get you there.
 
TSny said:
I didn't really follow your last equation here.

If the particle starts at rest at time t = 0, then the particle will remain at rest if you can show that all derivatives ##\frac{d^nx^k}{dt^n} = 0## at ##t = 0##. Here ##k =## 1, 2, or 3.

You can use your equation ##\frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2} = - \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\gamma \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} ## to first find an expression for ##\frac{d^2 x^k}{d \tau^2} ##. Then see if you can argue that ##\frac{d^2 x^k}{dt^2} = 0 ## at the instant the particle is released. Then try to show ##\frac{d^3x^k}{dt^3} = 0 ##, etc.

To relate derivatives with respect to ##\tau## to derivatives with respect to ##t##, it will be helpful to write out ##\frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2} = - \Gamma_{\mu \nu}^\gamma \frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} ## for ##\gamma = 0## and keep in mind that we are considering the instant when the particle is released from rest.

I'm not claiming that the above procedure is the quickest way to the result. It's just a way that I think will get you there.
Analyzing the x-component:

\frac{d^2 x}{d\tau^2} = - \frac{\dot a}{ac} \frac{dx}{d\tau} \frac{dt}{d\tau} = - \frac{\dot a}{ac} \dot x \left( \frac{dt}{d\tau} \right)^2

The only way this is zero is if either ##\frac{dx}{d\tau} = \dot x \frac{dt}{d\tau} = 0## or ## \frac{dt}{d\tau} = 0##.
 
unscientific said:
Analyzing the x-component:

\frac{d^2 x}{d\tau^2} = - \frac{\dot a}{ac} \frac{dx}{d\tau} \frac{dt}{d\tau} = - \frac{\dot a}{ac} \dot x \left( \frac{dt}{d\tau} \right)^2

I believe there is a missing factor of 2. Your equation for ##\frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2}## in post #1 was correct. (But your conclusion that the ##\Gamma_{10}^1##, etc., should have a factor of 2 was incorrect.)

The only way this is zero is if either ##\frac{dx}{d\tau} = \dot x \frac{dt}{d\tau} = 0## or ## \frac{dt}{d\tau} = 0##.

We are considering the instant of time when the particle is released at rest in this coordinate system. So, you know the value of ##\dot x## at this instant.
 
TSny said:
I believe there is a missing factor of 2. Your equation for ##\frac{d^2 x^{\gamma}}{d\tau^2}## in post #1 was correct. (But your conclusion that the ##\Gamma_{10}^1##, etc., should have a factor of 2 was incorrect.)
We are considering the instant of time when the particle is released at rest in this coordinate system. So, you know the value of ##\dot x## at this instant.
So we say that if ##\dot x = 0##, then ##\frac{d^2 x}{dt^2} = 0##. Then to show for higher powers, simply differentiate the RHS which leads to more powers of ##\dot (x)^n## which are all zero.
 
Yes. So, if ##\dot{x} = 0## at ##t = 0##, then you get ##\frac{d^2x}{d\tau^2} = 0## at ##t = 0##. You then want to check that this implies ##\frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = 0## at ##t = 0##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K