Einsteins field equations us what type of index notation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of index notation in Einstein's field equations, particularly focusing on the role of the metric tensor and the summation convention in tensor notation. Participants explore how these concepts relate to the structure of the equations and the implications for understanding tensor components.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the metric tensor employs Einstein summation notation, while questioning how this applies to the field equations, which they describe as having a tensor form.
  • One participant clarifies that a tensor itself does not utilize the summation convention, which is specifically for simplifying the contraction of indices, and points out that the indices in the Einstein field equations are free indices without contraction.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about whether the components of the equations are obscured by the notation.
  • It is mentioned that the Ricci tensor and Ricci scalar involve contractions of the Riemann curvature tensor, suggesting that while there are implicit contractions, they are already accounted for in the equations.
  • A participant references a geometric interpretation of the metric tensor involving a triangle in curved space, indicating a conceptual approach to understanding the tensor's application.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit some agreement on the nature of the summation convention and its application, but there remains disagreement and uncertainty regarding the visibility of contractions and the interpretation of the metric tensor in the context of the field equations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings about the visibility of tensor components and the specific application of the summation convention in the context of the Einstein field equations.

oddjobmj
Messages
305
Reaction score
0
I know that the metric tensor itself utilizes Einstein summation notation but the field equations have a tensor form so the μ and ν symbols represent tensor information.

5H9ggup.gif


I'm trying to wrap my head around how Einstein used summation notation to simplify the above field equations but it seems to be more of a tensor notation than anything. Is it used here at all?

Edit: Ah, too early to spell 'use' correctly apparently...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A tensor by itself does not utilise the summation convention. The summation convention is used to simplify contraction of indices. There is no such contraction in the Einstein field equations and both ##\mu## and ##\nu## are free indices.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: oddjobmj
Thank you! It's not even wrapped into the components in anyway that might not be immediately visible?
 
Well, the Ricci tensor and Ricci scalar are simply contractions of the Riemann curvature tensor, so implicitly there are some contractions where you could use the summation convention, but in the end these are already done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: oddjobmj
Ah, the way the metric tensor was explained to me was with a triangle that might be in curved space which you are trying to find the hypotenuse of where the following is the metric tensor:

Ha7L7wV.gif


Which comes from:

4wu4jYO.gif
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 186 ·
7
Replies
186
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K