Elastic and inelstic collisions conceptual questions.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around conceptual questions regarding elastic and inelastic collisions, focusing on specific diagrams that illustrate these types of collisions without providing numerical values for mass or velocity. Participants are tasked with determining the nature of the collisions based on the given information and assumptions about angles and directions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the possibility that all collisions could be either elastic or inelastic due to the lack of specific initial conditions. There is a discussion about the implications of kinetic energy loss and the conditions under which a collision could be considered perfectly inelastic. Some participants suggest reasoning through the problem by considering reversibility and entropy changes in elastic collisions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and clarifications on the nature of elastic and inelastic collisions. Some have offered conceptual frameworks, such as thinking about the collisions in reverse, while others seek further explanation on these ideas. There is no explicit consensus reached yet, as participants continue to question and explore the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific values for mass and velocity, which complicates the analysis of the collisions. The angles in the diagrams are described as vague, leading to uncertainty in interpreting the scenarios presented.

R_moor
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The questions showed in the pictures ask me whether the collisions in the drawings could be elastic or inelastic, I am not given any mass, the angles are a little vague but I think B and C are supposed to be π/2 and π respectively. For velocity, I am just given the direction and somewhat the magnitude but no numbers. Also the dot represents where the particles collided.

Homework Equations


Conservation of momentum: P_initial = P_final
Conservation of energy: KE initial = KE energy final + Q
Q is just the energy lost or gained during the collision.

The Attempt at a Solution


So far I think that all of them could be elastic and inelastic as without any information of the initial state of the system I can't know whether we are loosing some kinetic energy or not. The problem is I'm not sure whether my reasoning is correct as I am not sure how can I prove this. Any help to reason out the correct answer would be very appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • 1d.jpg
    1d.jpg
    48.1 KB · Views: 658
  • 1f.jpg
    1f.jpg
    55.7 KB · Views: 602
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a very easy way to think about 1d: "backwards".
 
1f is somewhat problematic. A collision is inelastic if any KE is lost, no matter how little. Consequently, if a diagram depicts an elastic collision, the same diagram could work for inelastic, however slightly.
My guess is that for 1f you are supposed to consider whether it could have been "perfectly inelastic". That means, as much KE was lost as is consistent with conservation of momentum, no friction, point masses (so no rotation) and non-penetration (they cannot pass through each other).
 
haruspex said:
There is a very easy way to think about 1d: "backwards".
Sorry I'm not sure what you mean by working it backwards. Could you explain a little more please
 
R_moor said:
Sorry I'm not sure what you mean by working it backwards. Could you explain a little more please
A feature of elastic collisions is no change in entropy. The process is in principle reversible, i.e., you can run time backwards to recreate the initial condition. Just reverse the arrows. What does it remain to check?
 
haruspex said:
A feature of elastic collisions is no change in entropy. The process is in principle reversible, i.e., you can run time backwards to recreate the initial condition. Just reverse the arrows. What does it remain to check?
Sorry for late reply, Thanks for the help !
 
R_moor said:
Sorry for late reply, Thanks for the help !
Does this mean you have answered the question?
Were you able to answer my question at the end of post #5?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K