Elastic collision with a massless box

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an elastic collision involving a block of negligible mass and a massless box on a horizontal plane. Participants explore the implications of the collision dynamics and the physical interpretations of massless objects in the context of momentum and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the meaning of "fate of the collision" and the implications of using a massless box in the analysis. There are inquiries about the energy and momentum of a massless box, and whether these depend on its velocity. Some suggest analyzing a realistic version of the problem before considering the ideal case.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering different perspectives on the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the analysis of idealized scenarios, and there is an ongoing exploration of the center of mass frame in elastic collisions. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being considered.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints regarding the physical realism of a massless box, and participants are reflecting on the implications of this assumption. The original poster has also referenced a related question about assigning signs to energy, indicating a broader context of inquiry.

hdp
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
At one stage of my problem, I am stuck with this problem :
A block with negligible size and mass m if put in a box of no mass is situated on a horizontal plane. And the block starts moving with velocity V it would collide with the box elastically. What would be the fate of the collision.
Relevant Equations
P = mv
Momentum Conservation
Kinetic energy Conservation
Using elastic equation I think the box and the block would stich together

[Mentor Note -- Sideways, dark image fixed up]
Sideways05.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hdp said:
Homework Statement: At one stage of my problem, I am stuck with this problem :
A block with negligible size and mass m if put in a box of no mass is situated on a horizontal plane. And the block starts moving with velocity V it would collide with the box elastically. What would be the fate of the collision.
Relevant Equations: P = mv
Momentum Conservation
Kinetic energy Conservation

Using elastic equation I think the box and the block would stich together
What is the energy of a moving massless box?
What is the momentum of a moving massless box?
Do either depend on the velocity of the moving massless box?
So can we ever deduce anything about the velocity of the massless box?
 
Can you post the statement of the problem as was given to you? I don't understand what "fate of the collision" means. From what you have told us, the only relevant equation here is $$0=0.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444 and berkeman
The reliable way to analyse idealised problems, such as zero mass, is to analyse the realistic version first then take the limit as the ideal is approached.
(With more than one idealisation the order of taking limits can change the answer.)
Giving the larger box mass M, what equations can you write?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and jbriggs444
hdp said:
Homework Statement: At one stage of my problem, I am stuck with this problem :
A block with negligible size and mass m if put in a box of no mass is situated on a horizontal plane. And the block starts moving with velocity V it would collide with the box elastically. What would be the fate of the collision.
Zero mass for the box sounds unphysical. However, you can get a (probably reasonable) intuition if you consider the case where the box’s mass is negligible compared to the block’s mass.

Where is the system's centre of mass?

Have you learnt about elastic collisions in the centre of mass frame? What events would an observer at the centre of mass see?

By the way, did you resolve your question “How to assign signs to energy?” (in the thread https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-assign-signs-to-energy.1059533/)?

Edit: typo's
 
@hdp, did you try the approach in post #4? The result is very surprising.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
916
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K