Conservation of Momentum involving Vf, elastic collisions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to the conservation of momentum and energy in the context of elastic and inelastic collisions. Participants are examining a scenario involving two colliding balls, with specific focus on the velocities and kinetic energies before and after the collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are discussing the calculations related to the final velocity of the second ball after the collision, questioning the assumptions of elastic versus inelastic collisions. There are inquiries about the origin of specific angles and values used in the calculations, as well as the interpretation of the textbook's answer.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing confusion over the textbook's answer and the conditions of the collision. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of elastic collisions, but there is no clear consensus on the correct interpretation of the problem or the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the specifics of the collision setup, including whether it is truly head-on and how the initial motion of the first ball affects the overall energy calculations. Participants are also considering the possibility of errors in the textbook's answer.

ericcy
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A billiard ball of mass 0.155kg moves with a velocity of 12.5m/s toward a stationary billiard ball of identical mass and strikes it in a head-on collision. The first billiard ball comes to a complete stop. Determine whether the collision was elastic.
Relevant Equations
Pt=Pt`
m1v1+m2v2=m1v1`+m2v2`
I tried solving it using this method and I got 12.5m/s, and assumed the collision was elastic.

The answer is actually 6.32m/s [41.5 degrees counterclockwise from the original direction of the first ball]; the collision is not elastic: Ek = 12.1J Ek`= 10.2J

I have absolutely no idea how the textbook could even get this answer. If you could explain the steps and why that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please show the details of your calculation. If the collision is head-on, there is no scattering angle involved. Where did the 41.5 deg. counterclockwise come from?
 
That was the textbooks answer, I have no idea how they got that. The collision is head-on. I used m1v1=m2v2` and subbed in all the values except for v2` and got 12.5m/s for m2. This means that when I solved for the total energies before and after the collision to check if it was elastic, they were both the same (12.1=12.1). Would you say my answer is right?
 
ericcy said:
That was the textbooks answer, I have no idea how they got that. The collision is head-on. I used m1v1=m2v2` and subbed in all the values except for v2` and got 12.5m/s for m2. This means that when I solved for the total energies before and after the collision to check if it was elastic, they were both the same (12.1=12.1). Would you say my answer is right?
Yes. When balls of identical mass collide and the collision is elastic, they simply exchange velocities. This is the case here. I have no idea where the textbook got that answer either. Are there more parts to this problem? Maybe the answer belongs to a different part.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ericcy
kuruman said:
Yes. When balls of identical mass collide and the collision is elastic, they simply exchange velocities. This is the case here. I have no idea where the textbook got that answer either. Are there more parts to this problem? Maybe the answer belongs to a different part.
Nope. Just that question. That's what made me so confused because I had literally no idea whatsoever how they could have gotten that answer. Must have been a mix up. Thanks for the confirmation on the answer :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman
You were rightfully confused. The answer appears to belong to a two-dimensional collision problem. :oldsmile:
 
Curiously, the 12.1J does match the initial linear KE in the question. I think a lot of these textbook errors come about because someone adapted an existing question and failed to update the answer.

But there is anyway another problem here. It does not say exactly how the first ball was moving. If it had traveled any distance it would surely have been rolling, so its total KE would have been 17J. If the collision lost no mechanical energy, the second ball must have set off with the same rotation rate, but since that would have come about by static friction the second ball's rotation would be backspin.
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K