Elastic collisions and gravitational forces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two blocks on a frictionless ramp, where one block is released from a height and collides with another block at rest. The objective is to determine the maximum height the first block reaches after the collision, incorporating concepts of elastic collisions and gravitational forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial velocity of the first block as it descends the ramp and consider different methods to calculate it, including kinematics and conservation of energy.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using conservation of energy to analyze the motion of the first block, while others are exploring the implications of different assumptions about the motion and forces involved. There is an ongoing examination of the relationship between potential and kinetic energy in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the effects of gravitational acceleration and the specifics of elastic collisions, while also addressing the absence of friction in the scenario.

mickellowery
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two blocks are on a frictionless ramp. The first block has a mass of 5.00kg and is released from the top of the ramp 5.00m. It has a magnet on the front with the north pole facing out. The second block is at rest at the bottom of the ramp and has a mass of 10.00kg. The two blocks never touch. Calculate the maximum height block 1 rises back up the ramp after the collision.


Homework Equations


I assume I need to use m1v1i+m2v2i= m1v1f+m2v2f and the 1/2m1v1i2... equations. I'm having trouble with coming up with initial velocity for block 1 coming down the ramp.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
mickellowery said:
I'm having trouble with coming up with initial velocity for block 1 coming down the ramp.
Ignore the second block for just a moment. How fast would the first block be traveling when it reached the ground, if it simply fell 5 m straight down? Now how fast would the block be traveling when it reached the end of a frictionless ramp, if it slid down the ramp, and the top of the ramp was 5 m high? :wink:
 
OK I might be doing this wrong. I assumed that an object accelerating at 9.8m/s2 would travel 5m in .51s. This gave me a velocity of 7.30m/s. Am I on the right track? I'm still a little lost on how to get to how high it goes up.
 
mickellowery said:
OK I might be doing this wrong. I assumed that an object accelerating at 9.8m/s2 would travel 5m in .51s. This gave me a velocity of 7.30m/s. Am I on the right track?
Umm, no. Not quite. :rolleyes:

You could, if you really wanted to, use kinematics to find the first block's velocity when it reaches the bottom of the ramp. But conservation of energy is a much better way to go about problems like this.

The ramp is frictionless. So you can ignore friction. That means conservation of kinetic and potential energy is conserved, as the first block slides down the ramp. How much potential energy does the block have when it is at the top of the 5 m ramp? Thus, how much kinetic energy does it have when it reaches the bottom (remember we can ignore friction)? If you know the block's kinetic energy, what does that tell you about its velocity?
I'm still a little lost on how to get to how high it goes up.

Now is where you need to bring conservation of momentum into the picture, and model the collision. You've listed the relevant equations in the original post. You should be able to use them to find the velocity of the first block after the collision.

One more application of conservation of potential and kinetic energy should guide you to your final answer of how high the block goes back up the ramp. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K