Elastic Potential Energy and Hooke's Law Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the maximum velocity at which a car can collide with a truck's bumper, which is modeled as a spring. The context includes concepts from elastic potential energy and Hooke's Law, focusing on the relationship between kinetic energy and elastic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss equating kinetic energy and elastic energy to find the maximum velocity. There are questions about unit conversions, particularly regarding the compression distance of the bumper.

Discussion Status

Some participants are exploring the correctness of the original poster's approach and questioning the validity of the provided answer in the textbook. There is an ongoing dialogue about the implications of unit conversions and the assumptions made regarding the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the correct compression distance of the bumper, with conflicting interpretations of the problem's parameters. The original poster's calculations are based on a maximum compression of 0.15 m, while another participant suggests an alternative interpretation leading to a different compression distance.

y201
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small truck is equipped with a rear bumper that has a spring constant of 800,000 N/m. the bumper can be compressed up to 15cm without causing damage to the truck. What is the maximum velocity with which a solid 1000-kg car can collide with the bumper without causing damage to the truck?


Homework Equations


Kinetic Energy=(1/2)(m)(v^2)
Elastic Energy=(1/2)(k)(x^2)


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to make those two equations equal to one another and then isolate for "v" and solve for it. however, i got the wrong answer. the answer at the back of the book is 34 m/s. this problem is based on elastic potential energy and hooke's law. all help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you convert the 15cm to 0.15m? Otherwise the process you described is correct.

Actually, I just did the problem backwards. Using their "correct answer" of 34 m/s means the bumper must move 1.5 m, not 0.15. Basically the back of you book is wrong.
 
thanks a lot birkeland for your help.
what did you get as the right answer?
 
Birkeland said:
Did you convert the 15cm to 0.15m? Otherwise the process you described is correct.

Actually, I just did the problem backwards. Using their "correct answer" of 34 m/s means the bumper must move 1.5 m, not 0.15. Basically the back of you book is wrong.

what answer did you get using the 0.15m?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
977
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K