Elasticity / Diving Board problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter joshncsu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Board Elasticity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the elasticity of a diving board, specifically examining the deflection caused by a diver's weight and the effects of changing the board's thickness. The problem includes calculations related to spring constants and moments of inertia.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the spring constant and the area moment of inertia, questioning the appropriate formulas for bending loads versus axial loads. There is also discussion about how changes in the board's dimensions affect its stiffness and deflection.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct formulas to use for calculating deflection in bending scenarios, while others express confusion about the concepts of area moment of inertia and spring constants. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the implications of doubling the board's thickness.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of certain information, such as the board's width and the original mass, which complicates their calculations. There is also a mention of imposed homework rules that may limit the use of certain concepts not yet covered in their studies.

joshncsu
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The board's left end is fastened to a fixed support by a connection that is free to pivot. The board is supported to its middle on another fixed support point. A diver of mass 60 kg stands at the end of the board. (ignore the mass of the board for this problem)

The board extends 2.2 m from the pivot.
The diver is 60 kg.

I) Suppose the board deflects by 3 cm when the 60 kg diver stands on it. Now he jumps up and comes down on the board; at the lowest point of his motion, the deflection of the board is 6 cm. What is the net force on the diver?

II)A new board is installed that is twice as thick as the old board but is made of the same material and is the same length and width. Approximately how much does this board deflect when the 60 kg diver stands on it?

Homework Equations



\vec{F}_{sp} = k \Delta x

\Delta L = \frac{FL}{AY}

\Delta x = \frac{\Vert \vec{F} \Vert}{k}

thus,

k = \frac{AY}{L}

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved part I.

k = \frac{\vec{F}_{sp}}{\Delta x}

k = \frac{60 \cdot 9.8}{.03} = 19600 N/m

\vec{F}_{sp} = k \Delta x = 19600 \cdot .06 = 1176 N

I'm having a problem with part II. I figure since the area is doubled that I would use Young's modulus (Y) to solve this. But the following formula needs and area (A) and I don't know what to put for it.

k = \frac{AY}{L} = 1176 = \underbrace{\frac{AY}{2.2}}_\text{two unknowns}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are using the wrong formula for k. The formula you are using applies to members under tensile or compressive axial loads. You have, rather, a bending load deflection, which is a function of I, the area moment of inertia of the board, not A. If you double the width, I increases by??
 
I'm having trouble finding the correlation between I (inertia) and k (spring constant).

The formulas that I have thus far (in the textbook) for either are:

\vec{F}_{sp} = k \Delta x \hspace{1in} I = \sum mr^2

Note: Momentum or energy has not been covered yet.
 
joshncsu said:
I'm having trouble finding the correlation between I (inertia) and k (spring constant).

The formulas that I have thus far (in the textbook) for either are:

\vec{F}_{sp} = k \Delta x \hspace{1in} I = \sum mr^2

Note: Momentum or energy has not been covered yet.
You seem, however, to have chanced upon the spring constant, k, for a beam under axial load, which is k=AY/L. For a cantilever beam in bending, k is 3YI/L^3. I don't think you are expected to know that, but you should know the formula for calculating I for a rectangular shape, which is bt^3/12. So if the thickness doubles, and all else stays the same, I must increse by ??, and the deflection must be reduced by a factor of ?
 
Thanks for your help but I'm still confused. I've searched my book and I don't see that formula. I would try it anyway but I don't know what b and t are. I did find this:

Plane or slab, about edge (M = mass, a = length from axis):

I = 1/3 Ma^2

I know that a = 2.2, but the original mass is unknown or ignored. Even by going with that I get:

I = 1.613 \cdot M

So I can only conclude that if the mass is doubled then I is doubled. Though that doesn't seem right. And if it was I still don't know what to do with that data and apply it to the deflection of the board (delta x).

Sorry if I'm making this problem more difficult than it really is or if I'm missing something obvious.
 
You are confusing mass moment of inertia with area moment of inertia (also called the second moment of the area). It is the area moment of inertia that you need to be concerned with in this problem. Unless I've missed something, I'm not sure how you can solve for the deflection of the board when it's thickness is doubled, without having knowledge of the area moment of inertia of a rectangular cross section, which, as I noted earlier, is bt^3/12, where b is the width of the board, and t is its thickness. What this formula tells you, is that if the thickness is doubled, that is, multiplied by 2, and b stays the same, then the moment of inertia must increase by (2)^3 , or by a factor of 8. In other words, the board is going to be 8 times stiffer if you double its width. Accordingly, since the beam deflection is inversely proportional to the Moment of Inertia, when the Moment of inertia increases by 8, the deflection under the same load must decrease by 8. Thus, if it deflected 3 cm originally, when you double the width, its deflection must now be only ?. You don't have to know 'a' to solve this problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
16K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
22K