Electric charge is distributed inside a nonconducting sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an electric charge uniformly distributed inside a nonconducting sphere with a radius of 0.30 m. The electric field at a point 0.50 m from the center of the sphere is given as 15,000 N/C, directed radially outward. The question seeks to determine the distance from the center of the sphere where the electric field has the same magnitude as at the specified point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the equation E = KQ * (1/r^2) but express uncertainty about the necessity of knowing the charge. Some suggest that finding the charge density could be beneficial, while others question the relevance of calculating the total charge for solving the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the role of charge density and the applicability of Gauss' Law. Some guidance has been offered on expressing charge in terms of charge density and volume, but there is no consensus on the most effective approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of explicit information about the charge density, which some participants feel complicates the problem. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding regarding the relationship between electric field, charge, and distance in this context.

YamiBustamante
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Electric charge is uniformly distributed inside a nonconducting sphere of radius 0.30 m. The electric field at a point P, which is 0.50 m from the center of the sphere, is 15,000 N/C and is directed radially outward. At what distance from the center of the sphere does the electric field have the same magnitude as it has at P?

Homework Equations


E = KQ * (1/r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


So I tried using the equation E = KQ * (1/r^2) but I'm not given a charge. What should I do? Is finding the charge of P helpful? Does the charge not matter in this case and I'm just using the wrong equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
YamiBustamante said:

Homework Statement


Electric charge is uniformly distributed inside a nonconducting sphere of radius 0.30 m. The electric field at a point P, which is 0.50 m from the center of the sphere, is 15,000 N/C and is directed radially outward. At what distance from the center of the sphere does the electric field have the same magnitude as it has at P?

Homework Equations


E = KQ * (1/r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


So I tried using the equation E = KQ * (1/r^2) but I'm not given a charge.
You should be able to use that to determine the total amount of charge, and thus the charge density. Right?

What should I do? Is finding the charge of P helpful? Does the charge not matter in this case and I'm just using the wrong equation?
 
YamiBustamante said:
So I tried using the equation E = KQ * (1/r^2) but I'm not given a charge. What should I do? Is finding the charge of P helpful? Does the charge not matter in this case and I'm just using the wrong equation?
Often you just have to create an unknown then see what equations you can involve it in.
Let the charge density be ρ. In terms of that, what should the electric field at P be?
 
YamiBustamante said:

Homework Statement


Electric charge is uniformly distributed inside a nonconducting sphere of radius 0.30 m. The electric field at a point P, which is 0.50 m from the center of the sphere, is 15,000 N/C and is directed radially outward. At what distance from the center of the sphere does the electric field have the same magnitude as it has at P?

Homework Equations


E = KQ * (1/r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


So I tried using the equation E = KQ * (1/r^2) but I'm not given a charge.
You could use that equation to solve for the charge (as a function of E), but I think you'll find that it's not particularly useful.

What should I do? Is finding the charge of P helpful? Does the charge not matter in this case and I'm just using the wrong equation?

Here are some pointers to get you started.

  • Like @haruspex suggests, express the charge as a function of the charge density \rho, and the volume of the sphere.
  • Find an expression for electric field inside the sphere. Have you studied Gauss' Law yet? If you are allowed to use Gauss' Law, it makes the problem a lot easier.
  • If at any point you wish to invoke Coulomb's law, don't use the version with "k". Instead, use the E = \frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2} version.
 
Am I reading a different problem than others are?
  • The charge is uniformly distributed over the sphere's volume.
  • The magnitude of the electric field is given at a point external to the sphere.
It's clear that the total charge of the sphere can then be obtained immediately. Together with the dimensions of the sphere one readily obtains the charge density.
 
SammyS said:
Am I reading a different problem than others are?
  • The charge is uniformly distributed over the sphere's volume.
  • The magnitude of the electric field is given at a point external to the sphere.
It's clear that the total charge of the sphere can then be obtained immediately. Together with the dimensions of the sphere one readily obtains the charge density.
Correct! :smile:

I'm just saying that solving for the total charge (or even numerically calculating the charge density) isn't necessarily that useful in obtaining the final answer to the problem. Sure, one can do it, but it just doesn't really matter that much.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
collinsmark said:
  • Like @haruspex suggests, express the charge as a function of the charge density ρρ \rho , and the volume of the sphere.
  • Find an expression for electric field inside the sphere. Have you studied Gauss' Law yet? If you are allowed to use Gauss' Law, it makes the problem a lot easier.
  • If at any point you wish to invoke Coulomb's law, don't use the version with "k". Instead, use the E=14πε0qr2E=14πε0qr2 E = \frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2} version.
I don't understand how to get the charge density though and it's not even given to me in the problem, so how is that helpful?
 
YamiBustamante said:
I don't understand how to get the charge density though and it's not even given to me in the problem, so how is that helpful?
You do know the field at a certain point. If you can also obtain an expression for what that field ought to be based on the (unknown) charge (or charge density) then that will give you an equation.
 
YamiBustamante said:
I don't understand how to get the charge density though and it's not even given to me in the problem, so how is that helpful?
Perhaps I wasn't clear in my previous post. What I was trying to say is that putting effort into finding the numerical value of the charge or charge density is not helpful (although it's not harmful) in solving this particular problem. It couldn't hurt, but it won't help either.

If it aids in understanding, consider a simple pendulum. Its period is independent of the pendulum's mass. If you were given a problem to derive its period you could first calculate the numerical value of the pendulum's mass if sufficient information was given to you. But it wouldn't really help you to find its period. The simplest approach is just to call the mass of the pendulum m and leave it at that. This problem is kind of along those lines.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
872
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K