Electric Field above a Quarter Disk

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the electrostatic field at a distance z above the xy-plane due to a surface charge confined to a quarter disk. The charge density is constant, and the region of interest is defined between two radii, a and b, in the first quadrant of the Cartesian plane.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss breaking the problem into x, y, and z coordinates and suggest using double integrals. There is mention of integrating over tiny quarter rings and concerns about vector notation due to the lack of symmetry in the setup.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on setting up the integrals and addressing the vector nature of the electric field. There are multiple interpretations being explored regarding the integration process and the treatment of angles in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the original posting context and the transition from a different forum, indicating a recognition of the original poster's effort in framing the question appropriately for homework help.

Squire1514
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

  • 1. Problem Statement.
Find the Electrostatic Field at a distance z above the xy-plane and along the z-axis due to a constant surface charge σ confined to the region a < √(x2+y2) < b, 0 < α < pi/2.
In other words, find the Electric Field a distance z above a quarter disk occupying the region between the positive x and y axes from r = a to r = b.

  • 2. Known Equations
E = kq/r2
dq = σdA
dA = pi/2 * r' *dr'
r = √(r'2+z2)

  • 3. Attempt
The lack of symmetry is what loses me in this question. I know I need to set up tiny quarter rings and then integrate from A to B but I don't know what to do about the vector notation.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can break it into x, y, z coordinates. r^2 = (x^2 + y^2 + z^2).
Write it as a double integral over dx and dy.
 
Note to the Homework Helpers: This was originally posted in the Classical Physics forum. I moved it here instead of deleting it because the OP showed some thought and posted in a format that sort of resembles the homework forums template. Carry on!
 
Squire1514 said:
dA = pi/2 * r' *dr'
Firstly, here I think you must write \displaystyle{dA=rdrd\varphi } (\displaystyle{\varphi } is the azimuth). Note that if you have two charges at the same distance from the origin but in different angles they don't create the same field at the point along the z-axis. The two fields have the same magnitude but different direction! So you can not neglect the angle at the integration as you integrate vector to find the field.

Squire1514 said:
  • 3. Attempt
The lack of symmetry is what loses me in this question. I know I need to set up tiny quarter rings and then integrate from A to B but I don't know what to do about the vector notation.
You can solve it in such a way, but you have to find the field of the ring at first. So I think it's easier to use double integral in cylindrical coordinates (that's from where the \displaystyle{dA } I write above comes from). It's almost the same method with yours but you can find immediately the total field of the disk.

To take into account that \displaystyle{\vec{E}} is a vector it may help you to write Coulomb's law like that:
\displaystyle{d\vec{E}=\frac{dq}{4\pi \varepsilon _0}\frac{\vec{z}-\vec{r}}{\left|\vec{z}-\vec{r} \right|^3}=\frac{dq}{4\pi \varepsilon _0}\frac{\vec{z}-\vec{r}}{(r^2+z^2)^{3/2}}}
where \displaystyle{\vec{z}} is the point where you want to find the field position vector and \displaystyle{\vec{r}} is \displaystyle{dq} position vector.

You can analyze these vectors in the Cartesian unit vectors and then use a double integral in cylindrical. Note that it's difficult to integrate with cylindrical unit vectors because they are not constant!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
21K