Electric Field and minimum velocity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the minimum velocity required for a charged ring to traverse an electric field represented by the vector E = E0/l (xi + yj) N/C along a non-conducting rod. The initial calculation incorrectly suggested that the minimum velocity is zero, which was later corrected by integrating the electric potential until reaching the highest point of potential at (l/2, l/2). The correct approach involves recognizing the need to account for the potential energy changes in the electric field, leading to a non-zero minimum velocity requirement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potentials
  • Familiarity with vector calculus
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles in physics
  • Basic concepts of charged particles in electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electric potential energy in electric fields
  • Learn about vector calculus applications in physics
  • Explore the concept of energy conservation in charged particle motion
  • Investigate the behavior of charged objects in non-uniform electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of charged particles in electric fields and the application of vector calculus in solving related problems.

erisedk
Messages
372
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Electric field given by the vector E = E0/l (xi + yj) N/C is present in the xy plane. A small ring of mass M carrying charge +Q, which can slide freely on a smooth non-conducting rod, is projected along the rod from the point (0,l) such that it can reach the other end of the rod at (l,0) . Assuming there is no gravity in the region, what minimum velocity should be given to the ring, if QE0l/M = 8

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


1/2 mv^2 = QΔV
dV = E.ds (ds is the displacement)
dV ={ E0/l (xi + yj) } {dx i + dy j}
= E0/l (xdx + ydy)
V = E0/l ∫xdx + ∫ydy ( ∫xdx from 0 to l, ∫ydy from l to 0)
= 0

Hence velocity required is zero.
Which is terribly wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look (visually) at the field xi+yj maybe you will get some insight as to why the answer came out to be zero.

Edit:
What is the minimum velocity needed to get over a hill?
By analogy, your method is to integrate the force of gravity (dot ds) over the entire hill.
But of course, this yields an answer of zero (if the hill is the same height on both sides).
 
Last edited:
Got this one, just had to integrate till the point of highest potential, i.e. (l/2, l/2).
Thanks :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K