Electric Field and Potential in Spherical Shells

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field (E) and electric potential (V) in two thin conducting spherical shells with specified charges and radii. For region A (rr2), E=k(-5 nC)/r² and V=k(-5 nC)/r. The application of Gauss's Law is emphasized for accurate calculations, particularly for determining potential differences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field and potential equations (E=kq/r², V=kq/r)
  • Knowledge of conducting materials and their properties in electrostatics
  • Basic calculus for integration in electric potential calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law for spherical charge distributions
  • Learn about electric potential differences and their calculation methods
  • Explore advanced electrostatics concepts, including potential energy in electric fields
  • Review integration techniques for calculating electric potential from electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and potentials in spherical geometries.

rizardon
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider two thin conducting spherical shells. The inner shell has a radius r1=15cm and a charge of 10.0 nC. The outer shell has a radius r2=30cm and a charge of -15.0 nC.
Find
a)the electric field E and
b)the electric potential V in A, B and C, with V=0 t r=infinity
A: r<r1
B: r1<r<r2
C: r>r2


Homework Equations


E=kq/r2
V=kq/r

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the above formula, I get

For the region A
E=0 and V=0 because the charge within a conducting shell is 0

For the region B
E= k(10 nC)/r2, r1<r<r2
V= k(10 nC/r

For the region C
E=k (10 nC + -15 nc)/r2=k(-5 nC)/r2
V=k(-5 nC)/r

Am I doing it the right way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E looks okay, though I'm not sure if you think in the right way or not. But V is not :smile: Remember that only V(infinity) = 0. You should find the potential difference instead.
Have you learned the Gauss law yet?
 
Yes, I have, but using the law is quite confusing. How will finding the potential difference make any difference, since my Va would be 0 and what's left is Vb which is kq/r?
 
The formula E = kq/r^2 only applies to charge points, not a distribution of charges. In this case, where symmetry is present, you should apply the Gauss law. Consider a spherical surface concentric with the shells.

Again, the formula V=kq/r only applies to charge points. To find V, you should apply the original formula: dV = -Edr. Va=0 only if a=infinity, so you must do the integration from r to infinity.

EDIT: Forgot to mention something. After using the Gauss law, you should find that the formula of E looks similar to E of a charge point. That's why you got right answers for E :smile:
 
Last edited:
The equations you have mentioned are not appropriate here.

You'll need to use Gauss Law to find the field in the three regions you've mentioned.
Do you know how to use Gauss law? Look into your book if you don't.

Do you know how potential is related to the field?
 
The potential difference is V=k(integral)dq/r

V=-(integral)Eds=-(integral)Edr=-(integral)kQ/r2dr=-kQ(integral from a to b)dr/r2=kQ(1/b - 1/a)

Is this right
 
rizardon said:
The potential difference is V=k(integral)dq/r

V=-(integral)Eds=-(integral)Edr=-(integral)kQ/r2dr=-kQ(integral from a to b)dr/r2=kQ(1/b - 1/a)

Is this right

Only when E=kQ/r^2 from r=b to r=a :smile:
What if E=kq1/r^2 from r=b to r=c, and E=kq2/r^2 from r=c to r=a?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
999
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
879
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
671
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K