Electric field due to a charged disk

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the electric field due to a charged disk of radius R, specifically at a point P above its center, as outlined in Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics." The participants analyze the electric field equation for a uniform continuous charge distribution, \(\vec E = \frac {1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0} \int \int \frac {\sigma \hat{r}}{r^2}dS\), and address common mistakes in the integration process. Key corrections include ensuring the correct integration variable and addressing the contributions from concentric rings of varying radius. The final expression for the electric field is confirmed as \(|\vec E| = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}\cdot(1 - \frac{z}{\sqrt{r^2 + z^2}}).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics principles
  • Familiarity with Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics"
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in physics
  • Concept of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from charged disks and rings
  • Learn about the application of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Explore problems involving electric fields in different geometries
  • Review advanced integration techniques relevant to physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students of electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields generated by charged objects.

Noctisdark
Messages
224
Reaction score
35

Homework Statement


I'm reading Griffith-Introduction to electrodynamics, In chapter 2 about electrostatics, I've encounter few problems that I've managed, to solve (luck !), I'm asked to calculate the electric field due to a charged disk of radius R in a point P above the center (Pic)

Homework Equations


Electric field due to uniform continuous charge distrubition
\vec E = \frac {1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0} \int \int \frac {\sigma \hat{r}}{r^2}dS

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to use the usual approach, that is cutting the disk into little circles, \lambda = \frac {Q}{L} = \frac{\sigma A }{L} = \frac{\sigma 2 \pi r dr}{2 \pi r} = \sigma \cdot dr
The electric field due to that circle is |\vec E_z| = \frac {\lambda}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int \frac{dArc}{(R^2 + z^2)^\frac{3}{2}} = \frac {\lambda}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \int_0^{2\pi}\frac {zR \cdot d\theta}{(R^2 + z^2)^\frac{3}{2}},You just multiply by 2 \pi and sub the \lambda , |\vec E_z| = \frac{\sigma zR \cdot dr}{2\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{1}{(R^2 + z^2)^\frac{3}{2}}, I should have writtend\vec E_z because we'll integrate that from 0 up to R, so \vec E_z = \frac{\sigma}{2\pi\epsilon_0(R^2 + z^2)^\frac{3}{2}} \int_0^zR\cdot dr = \frac{\sigma zR^2}{2\pi\epsilon_0(R^2 + z^2)^\frac{3}{2}}, I know that this is wrong, so can someone tell me where I've messed things up ?
One more Request, where can I find more problems about electrostatics, I need some practice Thanks !
 

Attachments

  • téléchargement.jpg
    téléchargement.jpg
    5.2 KB · Views: 380
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First, in deriving the E field due to the circle, why is there ##r## when you have already defined the circle radius to be ##R##? Second you should check again the correct expression for the integrand of the E field due to a circle, for instance I guess you know that all E field components perpendicular to the circle's axis cancel out for any point on the axis. This gives us a cosine of the half-angle of the cone formed by the observation point and the circle, what's the expression for this cosine?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Noctisdark
I I've missed that, thanks ! I will Edit that right away, I've included the expression of the cosine in ##\frac{1}{(R^2 + z^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}##
 
Noctisdark said:
I I've missed that, thanks ! I will Edit that right away, I've included the expression of the cosine in ##\frac{1}{(R^2 + z^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}##
Yes I know that but don't you think you missed one thing in the numerator?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Noctisdark
blue_leaf77 said:
Yes I know that but don't you think you missed one thing in the numerator?
Aw there a z missing,
 
And finally in the last integral, the integration element should be ##dR## right, which means any ##R## must be inside the integral and to be integrated along.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Noctisdark
I think it should be ##dr##, because I've followed the approach that cuts the circle into little parts, from ##r \text{ to } r+dr##,
 
Noctisdark said:
I think it should be ##dr##, because I've followed the approach that cuts the circle into little parts, from ##r \text{ to } r+dr##,
Nope, remember in your approach initially you wanted to divide the disk into co-centric rings and calculate the electric field due to a single ring with radius ##R##, let's denote this circle's E field ##E_{ring}##. Having found this (hopefully you did it correctly), you still have to add contributions due to the other rings constituting the original disk. Which means you have to add up rings with varying radius from zero out to the radius of the original disk, let's denote it by ##R_{disk}##.
May be what keeps confusing you is that you haven't changed the ##r## in the expression of ##\lambda##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Noctisdark
Aw, I've missed that too, In fact I intended to make ##r## the radius of the rings but I wrote ##R## and sticked with it, Okey I'm going to edit that two, I think I wrote a wrong ##\lambda##, it's dR not dr too
 
  • #10
##\lambda = \sigma dR##
##\vec E= \frac{\sigma z}{2\pi\epsilon_0} \int_0^r \frac{RdR}{(R^2 + z^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}} = \frac{-1}{\sqrt{R^2 + z^2}}## evaluate from 0 to r and I get ##|\vec E| = \frac{\sigma z}{2\pi\epsilon_0}\cdot(\frac{1}{\sqrt{r^2 + z^2}} - \frac{1}{z})##
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Only some small mistakes left there, first you should check again whether ##\pi## should be present and why the magnitude of the E field is negative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Noctisdark
  • #12
##|\vec E| = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}\cdot(1 - \frac{z}{\sqrt{r^2 + z^2}}) ## Waow thank you very for your assistance :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: blue_leaf77
  • #13
You are welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
721
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K