Electric field inside a solid sphere

Click For Summary
To find the electric field inside a uniformly charged solid sphere, the correct formula is E = (1/4πε₀)(q/R³)r. The solution involves applying Gauss's law using a Gaussian surface with radius r, where r < R. The key is recognizing that the charge q in Gauss's law refers to the charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface, not the total charge of the sphere. By calculating the charge density and using it to find the charge within the Gaussian surface, the correct electric field expression can be derived. This method confirms the initial confusion regarding the interpretation of charge in Gauss's law.
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



We have a uniformly charged solid sphere whose radius is R and whose total charge is q. I'm trying to find the electric field inside a (r<R).

The correct answer must be:

E=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{q}{R^3} r \hat{r}

How did they get that answer?

The Attempt at a Solution



Since the sphere is not a shell, the E is not 0. And it should be found by considering a concentric Gaussian sphere with radius smaller than R. So by using Gauss's law for electric fields in the integral form we obtain:

\oint E . da = E \oint da = E (4 \pi r^2) = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0}

\therefore E = \frac{q}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r^2}

For E outside the sphere we use r>R, and inside the sphere we use r<R. But why is my answer so different from the correct result?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
roam said:
\oint E . da = \frac{q}{\epsilon_0}

In Gauss' law as stated above, what is the interpretation of q?
 
In the first answer, q is the charge spread out throughout the solid sphere, while in your attempt, q must be the charge enclosed by the gaussian surface.
 
TSny said:
In Gauss' law as stated above, what is the interpretation of q?

Thank you very much for the hint! The q in Gauss's law is the amount of charge inside the Gaussian surface. The q in the question is the total amount of charge spread across a volume of 4/3 π R3.

I found the charge per unit volume by q dividing by the volume to get:

q_{per \ unit \ volume}=\frac{q}{\frac{4}{3} \pi R^3}

And to find the total charge

Then I multiplied this by 4/3πr2 to find the total charge in the Gaussian surface of that volume. I got

q=\frac{qr^3}{R^3}

Substituting this back into Gauss's equation I got the right answer. I hope this was the correct thinking and approach.
 
Last edited:
Good work :smile:
 
Thanks a lot for your help! :)
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
883
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
636
Replies
10
Views
3K