Electric field of a sphere in a point A

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field vector of a hollow sphere with radius r and surface charge density σ at a point A, using integration techniques. The user initially attempted to integrate the electric field contributions from infinitesimal rings but encountered issues with integration limits and the location of point A. It was clarified that the integration should consider the distance from the center of each ring to point A, rather than using angular limits. The user aims to derive the electric field for both cases: when point A is inside and outside the hollow sphere.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics principles
  • Familiarity with electric field calculations
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in physics
  • Basic proficiency in using LATEX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from charged rings
  • Learn about integration techniques for spherical coordinates
  • Research Gauss's Law and its application to spherical charge distributions
  • Explore the concept of electric field continuity across boundaries
USEFUL FOR

Students in electrostatics courses, physics enthusiasts, and anyone seeking to understand electric field calculations for spherical charge distributions.

not_waving
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Member warned to use the formatting template
My first homework for electrostatics course I'm taking is to find the vector of electric field of a completely hollow sphere (radius r, surface charge density σ in a point A, by integrating the electric field through the whole sphere. I already figured out the electric field of a ring in a point on the axis perpendicular to the plane of the ring and passing through its center and I'm supposed to use that. I basically know how I'm supposed to integrate it but I can't seem to get it to work.

Anybody care to help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
not_waving said:
I basically know how I'm supposed to integrate it but I can't seem to get it to work.
Why? Show us your work.
 
Okay, so firstly i know the electric field of a ring anywhere on the z axis (1). I divide the sphere into infinitesimal rings, each occupying dtheta of the sphere, to get (2). Plugging in into electric field equation and integrating I get zero, which is true but only inside the sphere. However, the point I'm calculating the electric field in isn't necessarily in the sphere so it's wrong. I'm not good with LATEX so here's some pictures that outline my thoughts

eqns.png

okay.png
 
not_waving said:
My first homework for electrostatics course I'm taking is to find the vector of electric field of a completely hollow sphere (radius r, surface charge density σ in a point A, by integrating the electric field through the whole sphere. I already figured out the electric field of a ring in a point on the axis perpendicular to the plane of the ring and passing through its center and I'm supposed to use that. I basically know how I'm supposed to integrate it but I can't seem to get it to work.

Anybody care to help?
is A inside or ouside the shell?
 
rude man said:
is A inside or ouside the shell?
I'm supposed to derive both cases. I'd edit my first post to match the template but I don't know where's the edit button so my attempt at a solution is the second post.
 
Okay I figured I messed up my integration limits, they should be 0 and pi. Though, I still don't get the desired result.
 
not_waving said:
Okay I figured I messed up my integration limits, they should be 0 and pi. Though, I still don't get the desired result.
Since you already know what the axial E field is for a ring, I would suggest the integration is over a distance, not an angle - the distance from the center of each ring to M.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K