Electric Field of an Infinite Plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the electric field of a static system of conductors and charge, specifically focusing on an infinite plane where the potential is constant along the line x=y. Participants are analyzing various expressions for the electric field and their validity in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the infinite plane on the electric field, questioning the dependency of the field on the z-axis and the nature of the electric field in relation to equipotential surfaces. There is discussion about the validity of different expressions for the electric field and the use of cross products to analyze their correctness.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights and suggestions regarding the use of mathematical methods to validate their reasoning. Some participants indicate a preference for using the cross product to differentiate between potential solutions, while others confirm the correctness of certain expressions based on their understanding of the electric field's behavior.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the assumption that the electric field must be perpendicular to equipotential surfaces and are considering the implications of this on the expressions provided. There is also mention of the first axiom of electrostatics regarding the flux being outward normal to the plane.

magda3227
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
1. We are given a static system of conductors and charge. We know that x=y is a plane of equal potential (for example, a system that can give such result is an infinite plate in that plane). Which of the following fields can represent an electric field of such system?

a. [tex]\vec{E}[/tex] = az[tex]\hat{x}[/tex] - az[tex]\hat{y}[/tex]
b. [tex]\vec{E}[/tex] = a[tex]\hat{x}[/tex]
c. [tex]\vec{E}[/tex] = a[tex]\hat{x}[/tex] - a[tex]\hat{y}[/tex]
d. [tex]\vec{E}[/tex] = ay[tex]\hat{x}[/tex] - ax[tex]\hat{y}[/tex]
e. [tex]\vec{E}[/tex] = a[tex]\hat{x}[/tex] + a[tex]\hat{y}[/tex] + a[tex]\hat{z}[/tex]


The attempt at a solution:
I figured that since the plane extends infinitely in the z direction, no field can be present there. This is also because of the first axiom of electrostatics relating to the flux being outward normal to the plane. Therefore, choice e is eliminated. In fact, the z axis should have no effect on the field. a is also eliminated.
Also, choice b has no dependency on the y axis, but the E field should be partially dependent on it...b is eliminated.
We also know that the electric field due to an infinitely charged plane is constant. I want to say that the answer is therefore c...I am lead me to believe that choice d can be eliminated, but I'm not sure. I'm stuck between c and d.
Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some quick things you should know:

You must have,

[tex]\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{E} = 0[/tex]

if there even exists a potential.

Also, you know the electric field will be perpendicular to an equipotential. So take the cross product of the electric field with a vector perp to the x=y plane (cross products of parallel vectors should be 0).
 
Last edited:
If we say that x=y, then the method of taking a cross product between a vector perpendicular to the plate and the E-field works for both c and d, doesn't it? Or did I just miss something when I did it?
 
It can't work for both. Just work them out and you will see.
 
The electric fied points away from the plane. The unit normal to the plane is given by "c" with arbitrary constant a. C is the correct answer.
 
It is best if he used the cross product to show the answer is (c) and not (d) since the E-field is perp to the plane, and not give him the answer right away.
 
I agree. I only confirmed it a different way for him since he had already deduced the correct answer but not by the cross product or the unit normal methods.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K