Electric Field of an Insulating Cylindrical Shell

  • Thread starter Thread starter Winzer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylindrical Shell
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field and potential of a long cylindrical insulating shell with an inner radius of 1.38 m, outer radius of 1.61 m, and a charge density of 4.80 C/m³. The electric field at a distance of 1.87 m from the axis is determined using Gauss's law, leading to the formula E = -p(b²-a²)/(2rε₀). The potential at the outer radius is calculated by integrating the electric field from the inner radius to the outer radius, resulting in V = -p(b²-a²)/(2ε₀)ln(b/a). The integral approach and the importance of considering the charge enclosed are emphasized throughout the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's law for electric fields
  • Familiarity with electric potential and its calculation
  • Knowledge of cylindrical coordinates in electrostatics
  • Basic calculus for integration of electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's law in different geometries
  • Learn about electric field calculations for non-uniform charge distributions
  • Explore the relationship between electric field and electric potential
  • Investigate the effects of varying charge densities on electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone involved in electrostatics or electric field calculations will benefit from this discussion.

Winzer
Messages
597
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

A long cylindrical insulating shell has an inner radius of a = 1.38 m and an outer radius of b = 1.61 m. The shell has a constant charge density of 4.80 C/m3.
1. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a distance of 1.87 m from the axis?
2. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a distance of 1.51 m from the axis?
3. If we take the potential at the axis to be zero, what is the electric potential at the outer radius of the shell?

Homework Equations


E=\frac{kq}{r^2}
\oint \vec{E}\vec{dr}= \frac{Q_{Enclosed}}{\epsilon_{o}}

The Attempt at a Solution


For 1 i use E=\frac{kq}{r^2} but i am confused on finding q because i am given density of c/m^3. I am assuming an infinity long cyclinder?\vec{}
 

Attachments

  • InsulatingCylindricalShell.gif
    InsulatingCylindricalShell.gif
    1.6 KB · Views: 1,126
Physics news on Phys.org
Winzer said:

Homework Statement

A long cylindrical insulating shell has an inner radius of a = 1.38 m and an outer radius of b = 1.61 m. The shell has a constant charge density of 4.80 C/m3.
1. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a distance of 1.87 m from the axis?
2. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a distance of 1.51 m from the axis?
3. If we take the potential at the axis to be zero, what is the electric potential at the outer radius of the shell?

Homework Equations


E=\frac{kq}{r^2}
\oint \vec{E}\vec{dr}= \frac{Q_{Enclosed}}{\epsilon_{o}}
careful.. the integral should be E.da, not E.dr

The Attempt at a Solution


For 1 i use E=\frac{kq}{r^2} but i am confused on finding q because i am given density of c/m^3. I am assuming an infinity long cyclinder?\vec{}

Take a cylindrical section of arbitrary length L...
 
learningphysics said:
careful.. the integral should be E.da, not E.dr

Take a cylindrical section of arbitrary length L...

You are correct dA.
So:
dE= \frac{kdQ}{r^2}, dQ=pdV \longrightarrow dQ= 4.80 C/m^3 * 2\pi r l dr
 
Then:
E= \int \frac{k 4.80* 2 \pi r l}{r^2}dr
With he boundries a=a b=b
 
Winzer said:
Then:
E= \int \frac{k 4.80* 2 \pi r l}{r^2}dr
With he boundries a=a b=b

No... use gauss' law... what is your gaussian shell... what is the charge enclosed...
 
Oh of course..I would pick a cyclinder as my G surface.
 
Winzer said:
Oh of course..I would pick a cyclinder as my G surface.

exactly. can you write out the integral using gauss law for the first part? we need the field 1.87 m away.
 
Last edited:
Ok, thanks. i got 1 & 2.
 
how about 3?
I know V=\frac{kq}{r}
 
  • #10
Winzer said:
how about 3?
I know V=\frac{kq}{r}

Nah... I don't think that'll work...

The voltage at r minus the voltage at 0 is:

-\int_0^r{\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr}

You need to integrate this from 0 to b=1.61...
 
  • #11
But then i get a ln(r/0), with other stuff infront. ln is -inf?
 
  • #12
Winzer said:
But then i get a ln(r/0), with other stuff infront. ln is -inf?

That doesn't look right... the integral from 0 to 1.38m is 0... because the field is 0 for this part... so you just need the integral from 1.38 to 1.61.
 
  • #13
so does:
V=\frac{-p (b^2-a^2)}{2 \epsilon_{o}}ln(\frac{b}{a})
sound on the right track?
 
  • #14
Winzer said:
so does:
V=\frac{-p (b^2-a^2)}{2 \epsilon_{o}}ln(\frac{b}{a})
sound on the right track?

Hmm... I'm getting something different. Can you show how you got that integral?
 
  • #15
Well how should I do it?
 
  • #16
Winzer said:
Well how should I do it?

Get the field inside the insulator. Then do -\int_{1.38}^{1.61}\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr}

What do you get for the field in terms of r?

Use gauss' law. 4.80*{\pi}r^2h = 2{\pi}rh*E
 
Last edited:
  • #17
learningphysics said:
Get the field inside the insulator. Then do -\int_{1.38}^{1.61}\vec{E}\cdot\vec{dr}

What do you get for the field in terms of r?

Use gauss' law. 4.80*{\pi}r^2h = 2{\pi}rh*E

mmm.. i Think it should be E= \frac{-p(b^2-a^2)}{2r \epsilon_{o}}
I choose -p(b^2-a^2)=Q_{enclosed} because i had to integrate to find the charge enclosed.
 
  • #18
Winzer said:
mmm.. i Think it should be E= \frac{-p(b^2-a^2)}{2r \epsilon_{o}}
I choose -p(b^2-a^2)=Q_{enclosed} because i had to integrate to find the charge enclosed.

But the charge enclosed changes with r. You're integrating from r = 1.38 to 1.61... as you increase r, the charge enclosed becomes bigger.
 
  • #19
so b is replaced with r
 
  • #20
Winzer said:
so b is replaced with r

Ah... yes, you're right... I made a mistake in my post. I should have written:

4.80*{\pi}(r^2 - a^2)h = 2{\pi}rh*E

So that gives what you have by replacing b with r.
 
  • #21
ok, cool I got it. I just made the mistake of not letting charge vary with r.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
966
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K