Engineering Electric field of hemisphere with the given charge density

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field intensity at the origin of a hemispherical shell with differing surface charge densities. The approach involves slicing the hemisphere into rings to analyze the electric field contributions, noting that vertical components cancel out while horizontal components add up. The integration of these components leads to a formula involving the charge density and constants, with a correction noted for the differential surface element. The symmetry of the problem allows for simplifications, and adjustments to the calculations are suggested to ensure accuracy. The overall strategy emphasizes using Coulomb's law effectively to derive the electric field.
YehiaMedhat
Messages
21
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A hemispherical shell of radius ##4.0 cm## is located at the region ##z > 0.0## centered at the origin. It carries a surface charge distribution of density ##\rho = 2.0\times 10^{-6} C/m^2## in the region ##y > 0.0## and a surface charge distribution of density ##\rho = -2.0\times 10^{-6} C/m^2## in the region ##y < 0.0##. Apply Coulomb's law to find the electric field intensity ##E## at the origin.
Relevant Equations
## \vec{E} = \frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon r^2} \vec{a} ##
The question is:
A hemispherical shell of radius ##4.0 cm## is located at the region ##z > 0.0## centered at the origin. It carries a surface charge distribution of density ##\rho = 2.0\times 10^{-6} C/m^2## in the region ##y > 0.0## and a surface charge distribution of density ##\rho = -2.0\times 10^{-6} C/m^2## in the region ##y < 0.0##. Apply Coulomb's law to find the electric field intensity ##E## at the origin.
For me I considered slicing each half of the hemisphere into rings to get an intuition about how will the electric field will look like, so as in the picture, each vertical component is gonna be canceled with the other one from the opposing charge area, so we're left only with the horizontal components multiplied by 2.
WhatsApp Image 2024-11-04 at 11.03.00_405d988d.jpg

Integrating with phi from 0 to pi over 2 and theta from 0 to 2pi
##
\begin{aligned}
& 2 \int_0^{2 \pi} \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{(\rho d \phi)(f d \theta) \rho_s(\cos \phi)}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 \rho^2} \\
& =\frac{2 \rho_s}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0} \int_0^{2 \pi} d \theta \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \cos \phi d \phi \\
& =\frac{(2 \pi) 2 \rho}{4 \pi \varepsilon_0}[\sin \phi]_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}=\frac{\rho_s}{\varepsilon_0}
\end{aligned}
##
Is that correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My strtegy is
1. Get E-field for uniformally charged hemisphere shell at its center.
2. Couple the hemisphere shell with another hemisphere shell of minus charge. The E-field is doubled.
3. Halve this sphere with plus-minus half and half latitude. The E-field is halved.
So your question is equivalent to 1 which is easier to treat. It is
\frac{\sigma}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r^2}\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}rd\theta \ 2\pi r\sin\theta\cos\theta
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes YehiaMedhat
I’m inclined to agree with the above poster. You were right to project everything onto the ##z-\text{axis}## due to symmetry. However your expression for the differential surface element is missing a factor of ##\sin \theta##. Rectify this and your answer should work out.

I assume you know spherical coordinates and I assume you’re using the physics convention.

For a differential element in spherical coordinates

##d \tau = r^2 \sin \theta dr d\theta d\phi##

Now restrict yourself to the surface of that sphere.

How does ##d \tau## change?
 
  • Like
Likes YehiaMedhat
Back
Top