Electric field on the axis of a ring-shaped charged conductor

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the electric field on the axis of a ring-shaped charged conductor. A participant questions why the horizontal component of the electric field is not multiplied by two, given that the y-components cancel out. Another contributor clarifies that the integration bounds from 0 to 2π account for the entire ring, eliminating the need for additional multiplication. If the integration were limited to 0 to π, then a multiplication by two would be necessary. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding integration limits in electric field calculations.
yashboi123
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A ring-shaped conductor with radius a = 2.20 cm has a total positive charge Q = 0.130 nC uniformly distributed around it
Relevant Equations
E = F/q
1706663702409.png

Hello. I was wondering why do we not multiply cos(alpha) by 2. I believe we should do this since the y-components of the electric field cancel out, meaning there would be 2 x-components of the electric field(at least I think so). Currently, this derivation/answer only considers one horizontal component, not the other half.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does it only consider one horizontal component when the integration is from ##0## to ##2 \pi##?

The integration bounds take care of this “doubling up effect”.

If you did it from ##0## to ##\pi## you would certainly have to multiply by 2 at the end.
 
If have close pipe system with water inside pressurized at P1= 200 000Pa absolute, density 1000kg/m3, wider pipe diameter=2cm, contraction pipe diameter=1.49cm, that is contraction area ratio A1/A2=1.8 a) If water is stationary(pump OFF) and if I drill a hole anywhere at pipe, water will leak out, because pressure(200kPa) inside is higher than atmospheric pressure (101 325Pa). b)If I turn on pump and water start flowing with with v1=10m/s in A1 wider section, from Bernoulli equation I...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K