Electric Fields inside Conductors & Gauss's Law

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pandabear27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric field Gauss's law
pandabear27
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I am just starting to learn AP Physics C E&M, and I have some questions.

1. If I have a metal conductor sphere (neutral or charged), why is it that the electric field inside is always equal to 0?

2. Also, a question about Gauss's Law.
$$E \cdot A = \frac{Q_{enc}}{\varepsilon_0}$$
Since ##Q_{enc}## only accounts for the charges INSIDE of the Gaussian surface, when we solve for E, then does that only account for the electric field that is created by the enclosed charges, or also charges that could be outside of the Gaussian surface?

I would really appreciate any help. Thank you!!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.

2. all charges both inside and outside the surface contribute to ##\mathbf{E}##.
$$\int_S \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{S}$$ is proportional to enclosed charges.
 
Last edited:
Got it, thank you!!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
pandabear27 said:
1. If I have a metal conductor sphere (neutral or charged), why is it that the electric field inside is always equal to 0?
In a conductor, charges can move. What will happen to them if there is an E field inside the conductor?
pandabear27 said:
2. Also, a question about Gauss's Law.
$$E \cdot A = \frac{Q_{enc}}{\varepsilon_0}$$
Gauss' Law doesn't say that - it says $$\oint \vec E\cdot d\vec A=\frac{Q_{\mathrm{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0}$$The integral is important because Gauss is making a statement about the flux through a closed surface, not just some random non-closed surface.

Notice that a field line from a charge inside the surface will cross the surface once, and every field line from the charge will have the same sign for ##\vec E\cdot d\vec A## where it crosses. Thus the charge's contribution to the integral must be non-zero.

However, a field line originating outside the surface will cross twice, once inward and once outward, meaning it will make two opposite-signed contributions to the integral. They don't necessarily cancel exactly, but once you do the integral all these contributions do net to zero. So it's only charges inside the surface that matter for calculating the total flux.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K