Electric Potential Due to Spherical Shells

In summary, the potential at the inner sphere is the potential at the outer sphere, which is the potential at r=R2.
  • #1
StasKO
14
0

Homework Statement



A spherical shell of radius R0 has a non-uniform surface charge density: η=η0*cos(2θ), where θ is the angle measured from the positive z axis and η0 is a constant. This shell is inserted into another spherical shell (this one has a volume) with its inner lip at radius R1 and outer lip at radius R2 and in the volume between there is a perfect conducting material (denoted σ→∞). this outer shell is electrically neutral.

The two spheres are concentric.

Except for the volume between r=R1 and r=R2, the whole space is characterized by the vacuum constants, ε0 and μ0

What is the electric scalar potential everywhere?

I attached a sketch of the problem.

Homework Equations



Laplace Equation in spherical coordinates with azimutal symmetry (∂/∂[itex]\varphi[/itex]=0):

[itex]\nabla[/itex]2ψ=0

The Attempt at a Solution



In the regions r<R0 and R0<r<R1 I write the general solution for the laplace equation:
∑(Anrn+Bnr-n-1)Pn(cosθ), n goes from 0 to ∞ and Pn() are lagandere polynomials.

In the region r<R0 i set Bn=0 so that the solution won't "explode" when r→0. I "stitch" the two potentials (from either side) at r=R0 through the continuity of the tangential electric field and the discontinuity of the normal electric field due to η.

Here i got stuck. I think that I need to find the boundary conditions at r=R1 and r=R2 but I can't find it.

Any help would be appreciated,
Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • spherical shells.jpg
    spherical shells.jpg
    4.5 KB · Views: 499
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The potential is continuous at the inner sphere, and as the outer sphere is conducting the potential there ...

Everything outside of R1 is easy to solve.
 
  • #3
I understand that inside the volume of the outer sphere the potential is constant and equals to the potential at r=R2. but what is this potential?

In the solution that was given to us, the teacher just applied gauss's law in integral form to the region r>R2, found the electric field and then the potential. then he found the potential at r=R2 and since the volume is perfectly conducting it is also the potential at r=R1 and from there you have a boundary condition to solve for the unknown coefficients of the laplace equation.
I get all the process and it is pretty easy BUT in order to even start with applying gauss's law the teacher made the assumption that the electric field in the r>R2 region is fully spherically symmetrical meaning it has only a radial component.

how can this be if the charge density is non uniform??
 
  • #4
The potential at r=R1 is the same everywhere (and the electric field strength between R1 and R2 is zero), therefore the problem "outside" has the full spherical symmetry. Every non-uniformity of the charges at the inner sphere is canceled by the non-uniform charge distribution at the inner surface of the conductor.

but what is this potential?
That is your choice - the absolute value of the potential is arbitrary, as only potential differences have a physical meaning. It is convenient to have 0 as limit for r->infinity, but it is not necessary.
 
  • #5
well ill take it as it is but it still puzzles me how in a conductor one edge has non uniform distribution and at the outer edge the distribution is "suddenly" uniform. what prevents it from being also non uniform?
 
  • #6
what prevents it from being also non uniform?
The conductivity of the material
 
  • #7
so why in the inner edge of the outer sphere the distribution is non uniform? its the same conductor having the same conductivity. shouldn't it be uniform just with the total charge on that edge the same as the total charge in the inner sphere?
 
  • #8
so why in the inner edge of the outer sphere the distribution is non uniform?
As seen from the outside: otherwise the non-spherical contributions would not cancel.
As seen from the inside: The non-uniform field between R0 and R1 leads to a non-uniform induced charge distribution at R1 (remember: charge density there is proportional to the electric field strength close to the surface).
 
  • #9
okay ill ponder on this a bit more on my own..

thank you very much for your help and the extremely fast responses!
 

1. What is the formula for calculating the electric potential due to a spherical shell?

The formula for calculating the electric potential due to a spherical shell is V = kQ/r, where k is the Coulomb constant, Q is the charge of the shell, and r is the distance from the center of the shell to the point where the potential is being measured.

2. How does the electric potential due to a spherical shell differ from that of a point charge?

The electric potential due to a spherical shell is constant at all points outside the shell, while the electric potential due to a point charge decreases with distance from the charge. Additionally, the electric potential inside a spherical shell is zero, while the electric potential inside a point charge is non-zero.

3. Can the electric potential due to a spherical shell be negative?

Yes, the electric potential due to a spherical shell can be negative. This occurs when the charge of the shell is negative, which results in a negative value for the electric potential.

4. How does the electric potential due to a conducting spherical shell differ from that of a non-conducting shell?

The electric potential due to a conducting spherical shell is constant at all points both inside and outside the shell. In contrast, the electric potential due to a non-conducting shell is only constant outside the shell and varies inside the shell.

5. What is the relationship between the electric potential and the electric field due to a spherical shell?

The electric field due to a spherical shell can be calculated by taking the negative derivative of the electric potential with respect to distance. This means that the electric field is proportional to 1/r^2, where r is the distance from the center of the shell. Additionally, the direction of the electric field is perpendicular to the surface of the shell at all points.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
120
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
286
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
800
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
44
Views
741
Replies
5
Views
899
Back
Top