Electric potential due to two point charges near origin

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the electric potential V at a point (x,y,z) near the origin due to two fixed point charges +q located at (±a,0,0). The potential is expressed as V = [q/4∏*ε*a] [[2+(2x²-y²-z²)/a²], valid for small x, y, and z compared to a. The participants utilized the superposition principle and binomial expansion to derive the potential contributions from each charge, ultimately identifying the need to retain terms up to the second order for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and point charges
  • Familiarity with the superposition principle in electrostatics
  • Knowledge of binomial expansion for small parameters
  • Basic calculus for handling approximations and expansions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential from point charges using the superposition principle
  • Learn about the binomial expansion and its applications in physics
  • Explore the concept of electric fields and their relationship to electric potential
  • Investigate higher-order approximations in electrostatics for more complex charge configurations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in electrostatics, particularly those studying electric potential and charge interactions in a three-dimensional space.

raving_lunatic
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charge + q is fixed at each of the two points (±a,0,0). Show that the potential V at a point (x,y,z) near to the origin may be expressed as

V = [q/4∏*ε*a] [[2+(2x2-y2-z2)/a2]
where x, y and z are small compared with a.


Homework Equations



V(x) = q/4∏i*ε*r , where r is the distance between the point charge and x and V is the potential at x.

Superposition, i.e. V due to multiple point charges = the sum of V due to each point charge

(1+x)^n = 1+nx+... valid for small x.

The Attempt at a Solution



This seemed like an incredibly straightforward problem, which is probably why it's quite frustrating. I tried adding together the potentials due to each point charge, approximated using the binomial expansion:

V(q1) = q/4∏ε[(x+a)2 + y2 +z2]^-1/2

V(q2) = q/4∏εa[(a-x)2 + y2 +z2]^-1/2

Taking a out of the brackets as a common factor gives:

V(q1) = q/4∏εa [(x/a + 1)2+ (y2+z2)/a2)]^-1/2

and a similar expression for V(q2) but with (1-x/a)2.

I then expanded the squares and used (2x/a + (x2+y2+z2)/a2) as a small parameter to perform the binomial expansion; this gave

V(q1) = q/4∏εa [1 - x/a - (x2+y2+z2/2a2)]

V(q2) = q/4∏εa [1 + x/a - (x2+y2+z2/2a2)]

Which doesn't lead to the desired result when added; where did I go wrong?
 

Attachments

  • potential.png
    potential.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 593
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I've worked it out; need to keep the terms to the second order. Sorry.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
764