Electric Potential Energy, Point Charges and velocity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of electric potential energy and its relationship with kinetic energy for two point charges, specifically a small metal sphere with a charge of q1 = -2.90 μC and another with q2 = -7.20 μC. The user calculated the electric potential energy (U) at distances of 0.43 m and 0.8 m, yielding U0.43m = 0.437 J and U0.8m = -0.2349 J, respectively. The user correctly applied the conservation of energy principle to find the change in potential energy (ΔU) and its effect on the velocity of q2, concluding that the velocity decreases as expected due to the repulsive force between like charges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential energy and its formula: U = kq1q2/r
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy and its formula: KE = 1/2mv^2
  • Familiarity with the concept of conservation of energy in physics
  • Basic understanding of point charges and electrostatic forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation of energy in electrostatics
  • Learn about the behavior of electric fields around point charges
  • Explore the implications of Coulomb's law in different charge configurations
  • Investigate the effects of varying distances on electric potential energy
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as educators looking for practical examples of energy conservation in electrostatic systems.

Northbysouth
Messages
241
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A small metal sphere, carrying a net charge of q1 = -2.90 μC , is held in a stationary position by insulating supports. A second small metal sphere, with a net charge of q2 = -7.20 μC and mass 1.70g , is projected toward q1. When the two spheres are 0.800 m apart, q2 is moving toward q1 with speed 22.0 m/s as in figure 1. Assume that the two spheres can be treated as point charges. You can ignore the force of gravity.

I have attached an image of the question

Homework Equations


1/2mv^2 = kinetic energy
u = kq1q2/r


The Attempt at a Solution



As my attached image shows, I have gotten the correct answer fort his question but I'm not sure how I did it.

So I began by calculating the electric potential energy (U) when q2 was 0.43m away from q1.

U0.43m = k(-2.90x10^-6 C)(-7.2x10^-6 C)/(0.43m)

U0.43m = 0.437 J

My question at this point is why can I not just plug in my value for U0.43m (0.437 J) into the kinetic energy formula?

If I do this I get:

0.437 J = 1/2(1.70/1000)(v^2)
v = 22.67 m/s

Which, I'll admit, does not make sense because this says that the velocity of q2 has increased when it should decrease because q1 and q2 have same charges, thus they should repel each other, thereby slowing down q2.

I then calculated the electric potential energy (U) when q2 is 0.8 m from q1:

U0.8m = k(-2.90x10^-6 C)(-7.20x10^-6 C)/(0.800m)
U0.8m = -.2349 J

I then subtracted U0.800m from U0.43m
= 0.437 J - 0.2349J
= 0.2026 J

I then plugged this ΔU into the kinetic energy formula
1/2mv^2 = 0.2026J
v = 15.7 m/s

Why was it necessary to find the electric potential energy of the two distances?
 

Attachments

  • Hwk 4 question 2.png
    Hwk 4 question 2.png
    25.6 KB · Views: 1,629
Physics news on Phys.org
This is because the total energy is conserved. PE + KE = constant. So if the system has PE1 at some point, and PE2 at some other point, then PE1 + KE1 = PE2 + KE2, hence PE1 - PE2 = KE2 - KE1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K