Electric potential inside conductor derivation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The electric potential inside a charged spherical conductor of radius R is defined as V = keQ/R, while the potential outside is V = keQ/r. The electric field E can be derived using the relationship E = -dV/dr. Inside the conductor, since the potential V is constant, the electric field E is zero. This conclusion aligns with Gauss's law, confirming that the electric field inside a uniformly charged conductor is null, while outside it follows the inverse square law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and electric field concepts
  • Familiarity with Gauss's law
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, specifically differentiation
  • Concept of spherical symmetry in electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's law in electrostatics
  • Explore the implications of electric field behavior in conductors
  • Learn about the derivation of electric potential in different charge distributions
  • Investigate the relationship between electric field and potential in non-uniform fields
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electrostatics and the behavior of electric fields in conductors.

bemigh
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hey, i have this question:
The electric potential inside a charged spherical conductor of radius R is given by V = keQ/R and outside the conductor is given by V = keQ/r. Using E=-dV/dr, derive the electric field inside this charge distribution.

Alright, so I started to find the derivative of the formula for the potential outside the conductor, however Ke, and Q are constants. Therefore E=-KeQ. Subbing into the first formula, to solve for the potential inside the sphere, i got E= -V/R. Sounds good?
well, when i submit my answer, it says it needs a numerical answer, did i go wrong somewhere?
Brent
 
Physics news on Phys.org
R is constant and r is variable...
the E field is dV/dr whereas V is constant inside the conductor, therefore, the answer is zero...
 
Convince yourself of the physical implications of what vincentchan said, by using Gauss's law and intuition.

(a) what should the electric field inside and outside such a body be?
(b) what should the electric potential inside, on the surface and outside such a body be?

are (a) and (b) mutually consistent? If so, why? And if not, why not (in your answer that is)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
582
Replies
9
Views
723
Replies
7
Views
1K