Electric Potential Of Charged Finite Rod

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric potential due to a uniformly charged finite rod extending along the z-axis and determining an equal potential point on the x-axis. The subject area is electrostatics, specifically focusing on electric potential and charge distributions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up an integral for the electric potential but is uncertain about the boundaries and how to relate the potential at point P1 to point P2 on the x-axis. Some participants suggest using vector methods and integrating over the charge distribution.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively discussing the setup of the integral and the implications of the chosen boundaries. There is acknowledgment of a potential solution involving a logarithmic result, but the second part of the problem remains to be addressed.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the absence of numerical answers and the challenge of finding an equal potential point on the x-axis, indicating constraints in the problem setup.

Dylicious
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thin rod extends along the z-axis from z=-d to z=d, carrying uniformly distributed charge along it's length with charge density lambda. Calculate the potential at P1 on the z-axis with coordinates (0,0,2d). Then find an equal potential at point P2 somewhere on the x-axis


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I tried setting up an integral for the potential along the z-axis as such:
V= [tex]\int[/tex](1/4[tex]\pi[/tex][tex]\epsilon[/tex]) * [tex]\lambda[/tex]dz/z

but I'm not 100% sure how I should set up the boundaries? Also, since there aren't going to be any actual number answers I'm unsure as to how to equivocate my answer to some potential on the x-axis.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the equation for V should actually read

[tex]V = k \int \lambda dz'/z[/tex]

if that will help. Whenever a problem in EM is not immediately obvious to me, I always go to vectors.

[tex]V = k \int \lambda dl' \hat{R}/R[/tex]In this case you have R, which is the distance from the charge under consideration to the point of interest, r, which is the distance from the origin to the point of interest, and r', which is the distance from the origin to the charge under consideration. We know that R=r-r', and we need to sum up (integrate) over all the little possible charges of interest.

Give the boundaries and solution a try. You'll know you're on the right track if you get ln3.
 
I see, I integrated assuming P1 to be the origin, 0, and then from d to 3d and got lambda*K*ln(3) !

Thank You!
 
Yeah, that's the best way to do this particular set-up. You still have have to do the second part of the problem! :p

P.S. With that vector method I described to use its usually useful to note that (though in the Z part of the problem it didn't really come into play)

[tex]\hat{R}=\mathbf{R}/R[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K