Electric potential of nested spherical shells

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential of nested spherical shells using Gauss's law. The initial calculations for the potential at different points reveal a misunderstanding regarding the integration limits and the direction of the electric field. Corrections highlight that the negative sign in the integrand was misplaced, affecting the expected sign of the potential difference. Two methods for finding the potential at a specific radius yield different results, with the second method being correct as it considers the influence of the surrounding shells. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to properly account for the electric field contributions from all relevant charges when integrating.
songoku
Messages
2,507
Reaction score
402
Homework Statement
Two concentric spherical shells have equal but opposite charges. One spherical has radius ##a## and charge ##Q## while the other has radius ##b## and charge ##-Q## where ##b > a##. Find ##V(r)-V(\infty)## for the region:
(a) ##r>b##
(b) ##a<r<b##
(c) ##0<r<a##
Relevant Equations
##V=\frac{kQ}{r}##
##V_A - V_B=-\int^{a}_{b} \vec E. d\vec s##
##\int \vec E . d\vec A=\frac{q_{in}}{\epsilon_0}##
For (a), I got ##V(r)=0##

For (b), using Gauss law I get the electric field in the region to be ##\vec E=\frac{kQ}{r^2}\hat r##, then:

$$V(r)-V(b)=-\int^{r}_{b} \left(\frac{kQ}{r^2}\hat r\right) . (-dr ~\hat r)$$
$$V(r)-0=\int^{r}_{b} \frac{kQ}{r^2} dr$$
$$V(r)=kQ\left(\frac{1}{b}-\frac{1}{r}\right)$$

But if I imagine both charges to be point charges, then:
$$V(r)=V_{\text{by +Q}}+V_{\text{by -Q}}$$
$$=kQ\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{b}\right)$$

Where is my mistake?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
songoku said:
For (b), using Gauss law I get the electric field in the region to be ##\vec E=\frac{kQ}{r^2}\hat r##, then:

$$V(r)-V(b)=-\int^{r}_{b} \left(\frac{kQ}{r^2}\hat r\right) . (-dr ~\hat r)$$
In the integrand, you should not have the negative sign in ##(-dr ~\hat r)##. Instead, ##\vec{dr} = dr ~\hat r##. Note that ##dr## is a negative quantity since you are integrating from a larger value of ##r## to a smaller value of ##r##.

Considering the direction of the electric field between the shells, do you expect ##V(r) - V(b)## to be positive or negative for ##a < r < b##? Does your answer agree with this expectation?
 
TSny said:
In the integrand, you should not have the negative sign in ##(-dr ~\hat r)##. Instead, ##\vec{dr} = dr ~\hat r##. Note that ##dr## is a negative quantity since you are integrating from a larger value of ##r## to a smaller value of ##r##.
Ah I see
TSny said:
Considering the direction of the electric field between the shells, do you expect ##V(r) - V(b)## to be positive or negative for ##a < r < b##? Does your answer agree with this expectation?
The direction of electric field in this case is radially outward so I expect ##V(r)-V(b)## to be positive. My first answer does not fit, my second answer fits.

I have another question. How to find potential at ##r=a##? I did 2 attempts:
(1)
$$V(a)-V(\infty)=-\int^{a}_{\infty} \frac{kQ}{r^2}dr$$
$$V(a)-0=\frac{kQ}{a}$$
$$V(a)=\frac{kQ}{a}$$

(2)
$$V(a)-V(b)=-\int^{a}_{b} \frac{kQ}{r^2}dr$$
$$V(a)-0=kQ\left(\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}\right)$$
$$V(a)=kQ\left(\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}\right)$$

By considering both of them as point charges at the center, my answer matches the second one but I don't really understand why (1) is wrong.

Equation from (1) is like a situation where there is just one charge ##Q##. Since point ##a## is also inside another spherical shell so we can't consider the work done to move a charge from infinity to ##a## but need to consider the boundary of the larger shell?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
Ah I see

The direction of electric field in this case is radially outward so I expect ##V(r)-V(b)## to be positive.
Yes.

songoku said:
I have another question. How to find potential at ##r=a##? I did 2 attempts:
(1)
$$V(a)-V(\infty)=-\int^{a}_{\infty} \frac{kQ}{r^2}dr$$
Write $$V(a)-V(\infty)=-\int^{a}_{\infty} \vec E_{net} \cdot \vec{dr} = -\int^{b}_{\infty} \vec E_{net} \cdot \vec{dr} -\int^{a}_{b} \vec E_{net} \cdot \vec{dr}$$ Think about what to substitute for ##\vec E_{net}## in each integral on the far right.
 
Thank you very much TSny
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
992
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K