Electric potential of nested spherical shells

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric potential of nested spherical shells using Gauss's law. The initial calculations for the potential at different points reveal a misunderstanding regarding the integration limits and the direction of the electric field. Corrections highlight that the negative sign in the integrand was misplaced, affecting the expected sign of the potential difference. Two methods for finding the potential at a specific radius yield different results, with the second method being correct as it considers the influence of the surrounding shells. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to properly account for the electric field contributions from all relevant charges when integrating.
songoku
Messages
2,488
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
Two concentric spherical shells have equal but opposite charges. One spherical has radius ##a## and charge ##Q## while the other has radius ##b## and charge ##-Q## where ##b > a##. Find ##V(r)-V(\infty)## for the region:
(a) ##r>b##
(b) ##a<r<b##
(c) ##0<r<a##
Relevant Equations
##V=\frac{kQ}{r}##
##V_A - V_B=-\int^{a}_{b} \vec E. d\vec s##
##\int \vec E . d\vec A=\frac{q_{in}}{\epsilon_0}##
For (a), I got ##V(r)=0##

For (b), using Gauss law I get the electric field in the region to be ##\vec E=\frac{kQ}{r^2}\hat r##, then:

$$V(r)-V(b)=-\int^{r}_{b} \left(\frac{kQ}{r^2}\hat r\right) . (-dr ~\hat r)$$
$$V(r)-0=\int^{r}_{b} \frac{kQ}{r^2} dr$$
$$V(r)=kQ\left(\frac{1}{b}-\frac{1}{r}\right)$$

But if I imagine both charges to be point charges, then:
$$V(r)=V_{\text{by +Q}}+V_{\text{by -Q}}$$
$$=kQ\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{b}\right)$$

Where is my mistake?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
songoku said:
For (b), using Gauss law I get the electric field in the region to be ##\vec E=\frac{kQ}{r^2}\hat r##, then:

$$V(r)-V(b)=-\int^{r}_{b} \left(\frac{kQ}{r^2}\hat r\right) . (-dr ~\hat r)$$
In the integrand, you should not have the negative sign in ##(-dr ~\hat r)##. Instead, ##\vec{dr} = dr ~\hat r##. Note that ##dr## is a negative quantity since you are integrating from a larger value of ##r## to a smaller value of ##r##.

Considering the direction of the electric field between the shells, do you expect ##V(r) - V(b)## to be positive or negative for ##a < r < b##? Does your answer agree with this expectation?
 
TSny said:
In the integrand, you should not have the negative sign in ##(-dr ~\hat r)##. Instead, ##\vec{dr} = dr ~\hat r##. Note that ##dr## is a negative quantity since you are integrating from a larger value of ##r## to a smaller value of ##r##.
Ah I see
TSny said:
Considering the direction of the electric field between the shells, do you expect ##V(r) - V(b)## to be positive or negative for ##a < r < b##? Does your answer agree with this expectation?
The direction of electric field in this case is radially outward so I expect ##V(r)-V(b)## to be positive. My first answer does not fit, my second answer fits.

I have another question. How to find potential at ##r=a##? I did 2 attempts:
(1)
$$V(a)-V(\infty)=-\int^{a}_{\infty} \frac{kQ}{r^2}dr$$
$$V(a)-0=\frac{kQ}{a}$$
$$V(a)=\frac{kQ}{a}$$

(2)
$$V(a)-V(b)=-\int^{a}_{b} \frac{kQ}{r^2}dr$$
$$V(a)-0=kQ\left(\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}\right)$$
$$V(a)=kQ\left(\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{b}\right)$$

By considering both of them as point charges at the center, my answer matches the second one but I don't really understand why (1) is wrong.

Equation from (1) is like a situation where there is just one charge ##Q##. Since point ##a## is also inside another spherical shell so we can't consider the work done to move a charge from infinity to ##a## but need to consider the boundary of the larger shell?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
Ah I see

The direction of electric field in this case is radially outward so I expect ##V(r)-V(b)## to be positive.
Yes.

songoku said:
I have another question. How to find potential at ##r=a##? I did 2 attempts:
(1)
$$V(a)-V(\infty)=-\int^{a}_{\infty} \frac{kQ}{r^2}dr$$
Write $$V(a)-V(\infty)=-\int^{a}_{\infty} \vec E_{net} \cdot \vec{dr} = -\int^{b}_{\infty} \vec E_{net} \cdot \vec{dr} -\int^{a}_{b} \vec E_{net} \cdot \vec{dr}$$ Think about what to substitute for ##\vec E_{net}## in each integral on the far right.
 
Thank you very much TSny
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top